Search results

lol.no mate it doesnt convert it to RWD. but it also doesnt mean extra wheelspin. i take it you dont like FWD then?? predictable...not really, understeer....takes a deft right foot to steer it on the throttle as much as it does with RWD

pe2s ..my road tyres.....and they usually get me home too ;)............just lol altho it had a539s on the back on that vid.

have you actually driven a charged clio^^^????

lol no mate he was toying with me........i was pretty much flat out, hence passing pretty much evrything else, 225 megs, 197s, 182s, 172s, and other williams es. altho mine was running std williams cams and a std 1.8 valver head at the time due to the kent cams exploding and destroying...

yep..........u did mate. its still a Fix Or Repair Daily at the end of the day. and somethings thats supposed to be pretty quick. whereas the clios just a shopping trolley i know how much my minis used to piss off my Fix Or Repair Daily fan mates back in the day, xr 2/3/is and the odd...

^^^^^^^ he has a point lol.

my mate had a tweeked ra spec scoob years ago, was supposedly running 300+ bhp. the track car had the bodies on then , not overly impressive imho, and it used to rip him a new arsehole. the boosted clio would have done the same to the bodied track car. no question.

and like i said....add into that the 25% min loss thru the transmission..............the charged clio would rape it.

lmao but a p1 with 350 ...power to weight is never going to be as quick as a clio with 270...... not to mention the power sapping 4wd system for a grand on a scoob, zorst, remap n thatd b your lot pretty much

and still be slower......and still lose loads in depreciation.

i thought it was because you couldnt afford one..or so you said. btw...my williams 0159 STILL doesnt rattle or squeek etc. 0051 however is a diff story. like evrything, theres good ones and bad ones....altho havin no trim etc in 0051 doesnt help much tbh

lol....i know that mate....was posting in response to ur comments ;) personally i think the ph 1 LOOKS better than the rest. as for driving.....they are probably much of a muchness......like all cars you get gd and bad ones....ask jamie ...his willy was a bad un . ;) if i was to buy a 1*2...

personally i prefer the looks of the ph1. the later ones all look alike, whether it be a 1.2 or a 1*2. and im not on the 'step up' to a faster clio....i have a williams..a 17/82 would be a step down to a slower clio tbqfh go for the ph1 mate....add a few bits for the extra grand and...

was done in a mk1 too...only that handled as well as having the straight line grunt. flan built that 1 tho. D4DTYrE3pWw

obviously you havent spent any decent time behind the wheel of a s/c 172 then....traction is NOT an issue, any more so than a std one.

after having spent a bit of time behind the wheel of both. get the meg. ;) soooooo much easier to drive quickly, and lots better as an everyday car. vx is good, dont get me wrong, but a bit gutless imho if it isnt the tub version

man after my own heart....keep the foot in, itl keep goin where you want lol. and a little tribute to the man the legend.... 8C1zkO4XMig the ending just goes to show even the best get it wrong sometimes lol.

almost as legendary as the cars he drives to victory ;) dN2t4uT97Yo bCIOGlllGDw

lmao....funny as...lol they cant make them remove the video as its filmed in a public place. so they have no say whatsoever. the insurance claim will be funny though. who was driving at the time of the incident?......errrrrrr nobody because we jumped out of the moving car. lol...

i have/had a bodied williams. as above there are turbod versions of both valver and williams, but not a charged one....as of yet ;)

plenty about mate if you look hard enough. granted not williams, but as u rightly say, meg 710/714s. yes they need the dizzy machining out if you want to run the meg head. which is where the valver head comes in. few quid for headset but then its done n forgotten about. slightly smaller...

lol..no mate ur right. i dont have the experience of making a mk1/f4 loom. as for being qualified......wtf?? is there a qualification for it?? lol judging by r/r days etc the f7s always produce the goods, the f4s are very hit and miss. some produce only a little less than std reno figures...

would still be better off with charger tho imho. no lag, etc

iirc i think the f4s are around the 265 mark not 100% sure on that one tho. but they are a lot more duration/lift than a std williams. and hes gunna be pulling an engine out either way, a straight swap of evrything from f7p/f7r, loom ecu etc, get the ecu chipped, like i say a gunner chip...

see what your saying mate, but tbh if the lads gunna be taking on the conversion himself, then throwing a set of cams in an f7 is gunna be childs play. f7 vs f4. only way to compare would be to get them to same spec, which would mean camming the f7 for a start to bring it in line with the f4s...

like i said...depends who tunes it. ;) back street build over tuner builds evry day of the week for me tbh. there are pros and cons for both. as said previously, personally id stick with the f7, easier, cheaper, and slightly quicker ;) again all imho

but plenty of other people did. remember nick read?? and all the development work he paid thru the nose for them?? i asked what r&d theyd done for the turbo conversions etc.....after a blank look....'what' was the answer lmao. cowboys they were

how did he manage to lose that in such a big way? didnt look like much correction was needed tbh. and as above..where the fook did the photographer go?? lol@ lookin under bonnet for him

lol^^^^ dan = nob = stromba he really is as clueless and opinionated as his reputation professes

in that case....adis cliorossa had £000s spent on it, kill power modded/chipped, was only slightly quicker than my standard williams. couple of hundred quidsworth of cams n his ass was mine. mapped on top of that i handed him his ass evry time, til he got the giggle gas....5 mins and 1 empty...