Search results

let me tell you my 172 mk1 blows 106gtis into the weeds. theres far too much power difference ive proved this many times agianst my mates 106gti, he ends up about 1/2 mile away every time we have a proper blast.. we get them both rolling in second at about 20mph then floor it. The 172 just...

seems pretty dangerous too..

mines wicked a few teething problems like some annoying airbag light but now its cool, engines smooth and pulls like a train for me plenty quick enough good on fuel done 33000 miles make sure its run on 98 fuel like mine and youll hold off mit sub vr4s till 5th gear :) its great fun. I had a...

cool ,, that mk1 172 driver could of done better against the scoobies , but he didnt do too bad the scoobies could never really leave him apart from some turbo action on straights..

http://www.racecar.co.uk/stealth/autocar1003.htmhttp://www.racecar.co.uk/stealth/autocar1003.htm This is the test the mk1 172 did the 100-0mph in 3.99secs the fastest time of the day !!!! HAHA RICh D i told you. I had the issue some supercars were getting 4.3 etc... Autocars figures are...

http://www.racecar.co.uk/stealth/autocar1003.htmhttp://www.racecar.co.uk/stealth/autocar1003.htm This is the test the mk1 172 did the 100-0mph in 3.99secs the fastest time of the day !!!! HAHA RICh D i told you. I had the issue some supercars were getting 4.3 etc... Autocars figures are...

i raced one coming off a rd about there was flames shooting out his exhaust LOL i had to ease offf though it was quite quick and noisy

cant view .mov

ive toasted a vts a ended up prob a dual carriage away LOL @vts what muppets.

ive toasted a few rd here :) i aint scared of a 1.6

ive toasted a vts a ended up prob a dual carriage away LOL @vts what muppets.

a lot why? same size engine etc cant see that.

Underestimate the VTS/106 GTi at your peril haha what a 1.6 are you joking? How much faster would you say they are to a corsa GSI when moving?

rich d you dont mention any in gear times which are very important as is braking from 100 which the 172 has been tested at 3.99 secs thats super car whooping, also teady is right about the 17.9 secs i have the issue somewhere in my room, also autoexpress tested the mk1 ages ago at 6.54 secs vs a...

rich d you dont mention any in gear times which are very important as is braking from 100 which the 172 has been tested at 3.99 secs thats super car whooping, also teady is right about the 17.9 secs i have the issue somewhere in my room, also autoexpress tested the mk1 ages ago at 6.54 secs vs a...

no thats weird looking to tall and people carrier esque

FUC KING gitsos i hate them and this usless government

does anyone have a picture of a bread van i dont no what a bread van is and want to compare:confused:

i hope they know what there doing?

what? the fastest (the rallye is 19s) the 172 is 17s the others are pants slow

well i destroyed one and a 106gti...

please no, that sss a people carrier

what? the fastest (the rallye is 19s) the 172 is 17s the others are pants slow

yeah.. ive test drove a CTR felt solid and engines are the nuts, its prob faster top end i dont know it felt planted though. If it weighed 1050kg it would take off Vts/106 are mini pocket rockets.

booo!

of course its not slow itll prob beat 90% of the cars on the rd. The clios light though 17s to 100! Maybe bury boy cant drive or has crap fuel in it.

im sorry but a vts ffs ive destroyed loads rd here, a 1.6 with 120bhp nah.. My mate has a CTR and even he admits its not any quicker than my 172, in fact i think mines quicker :) i think the CTR looks odd. a VTS haha thats a joke i nearly rear ended one i think he needed a push.

of course its not slow itll prob beat 90% of the cars on the rd. The clios light though 17s to 100! Maybe bury boy cant drive or has crap fuel in it.

yeah!

hehe