Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
key points,
1. Cups are bought by people who can't afford a normal 172
2. The weight loss does not make a difference in performance
3. 182 seats are far more comfy than CUP ones as thay have leather
4. I couldn't possibly have purchased my seats without a loan
No, think i got all the points...
kept me entertained for the last half hour ;)
lol at the loan, there you go again, i obviously couldnt pay for recaros out of my own pocket as i have a cup :quiet:
has nothing to do with a good job etc
Not at all, how you can say most CUP owners can't afford a normal 172 is just plain :rolleyes:
You just can't accept that i have an opinion thats different to yours
You took the bait
:clown:
just accept that the weight makes a difference. If you say torque make a difference and the 172/182 have the same torque and bhp......
lose 89kg, what happens
its not hard ;)
they could have 14 stone of 'choonz' in their cars and still be level pegged with yours.
how you look down on 172 cups is laughable, to 99% of people its a clio, like yours
:)
i rest my case.... i was pointing out how silly your quote was ;)
and how does synthetic leather and alcantara make something more comfortable when the seats have the same padding and support?
nice edit........... you seem to forget that your 'gorgeous' 182 seats are exactly the same seats as found in my 'cheapo' cup.... only difference is yours are covered in cheap flannel and plastic :clown:
hmmmm so when a manufacturer in touring cars win a race, or become dominant, what happens? They get a weight ballast added to the car to even them up with the rest of the field, so weight has no meaning... even though all touring cars have the same hp?