Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Torque limiting is the future. Ferrari are using it as a way to replicate NA feel, with the inherent mpg benefits of modern turbos. If it helps the longevity of the car, I don't see a problem?
I normally get 340 miles from the 172 before the light comes on. That's mixed driving, motorway at 80. No doubt the st is a bit more economical than a 1*2 (fuel wise!)
Not disputing that, would be interested to know how it compares to the calculated. Ran a 1.8tdci for a while. Trip read 70mpg, but was only actually doing 57mpg. If it's actually 45mpg+ that's superb.
Is this the one you've looked at?
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/renault/renaultsport-clio/-reduced-for-the-weekend--renault-clio-172-ff-in-flame-red--49k-miles/2130646
I'd rather have good bodywork and belts need doing. That way you can get the belts done somewhere reputable and know it's been done correctly. But tbh, it's a £2-3k 10yr old car. There will be some issue's.
I've had pretty much all variations.
Ph1 172: my personal favourite. They do look older, but prefer the way they drive (15's, cable throttle)
Ph2 172: best compromise. More modern looking, better spec. Exhaust is cheaper when (not if) it breaks. More suspension options than a cup'd 182. I...
10% extra per month so someone else gets the benefit when it goes back? Nah.
St2 is very well specced. Has everything you could reasonably need. St2 mountune'd. Done.