Search results

people seem to forget the list for the 182 was 15.5k and the new ones gonna be better made etc for 500 quid more. not that harder bargain i dont think. discounts will come about.

quality pics!!!

the early 1.8t in the old shape cupra are s**t. they always go wrong. the mk4 varient are much stronger. if ur gonna tune tho ibiza is cheaper obvisouly being forced induction. its what you prefer.

that bloke in the frs was a c**k. wouldnt move over at all. shame tho, the clio looked quicker. suprisingly.

actually mk4s rattle alot. there crap. I work for vw so i do know. I think renaults less rattly. other than rattles there better build wise yes, especially mk5s, which still rattle. Older cars do sometimes rattle less!

gorgeous

yeah would be well good!! thats why google video is so good lol

i want to save it on my pc :( in my hugeeeeeee collection lol

nice to see some of britain still isnt council estate. nice motor

me wants a set of them plates very nice

look elsewhere. simple. sounds abused to me. gearbox sounds like its been rammed into gears upon hard acceleration. stay clear. dont make a rush decision.

na not from round here, am about here most weekend tho. im from down in high wycombe lol. i did have a good bit of fun a while back with another phase 2 172 coming on the trowbridge bypass, thought it might have been yourself cos they flashed me aswell! :) nice motor :)

golfs dsg book time 0-60 is 6.8, phase 1 172 is 6.6. only top speed is the gti better. 0-100 the clio is a second quicker (17vs18) Back on topic, I owned teh 182 with cup packs before a type r, and now a phase 172 for financial reasons, and i would overall say i preffered the 182, but i dont...

Hi yeah was me last night, thought you might be a cliosport member as yo uflashed us back! Hi :D

on in gear times yes, not through the gears tho. m3 would skin the 330d alive.

i went against a pulsar gti-r with 500bhp at pod last year... that ran a 11 something. i ran a 14.8 on that run. it was stupidly fast. i know it was 500bhp ish by time, and the fact it had a laminated sheet in the window. Another quick one was a Supra - modded clearly, it left me for absoulte...

i love autocar aswell. though evo is very well presented. its like a book rather than a mag. pictures are brilliant.

i dont think it looks that slow. lol @ the 1.2 that can go as fast as that. like f**k. you 1.2 and 1.6 owners r just tryin to big your clios up making them sound faster than what they are.

its off a peugeot website that vid. great. there is squealing from the 206, no roll from the 172 (which they do roll a fair bit) think its a muppet drive. the pegueot wouldnt ever keep up with two good drivers.

well i know most type r civics are about 170 atw, which normally is about 210bhp atf. so 150ish would seem about correct for 170 i suppose.

260ib.ft ;)

not being funny but subs dont weight 50 kg each, thats 8 stone each ur sayin. i dont think so lmao.

i found the driving posistion miles better in the new clio. steering wheel angle is better. dash is leagues ahead 2. and that was a dynamique model

yeah duh the maths isnt that hard. lol 2.0 litre, 194 bhp. so its not quite 100bhp litre lol.

was he some sort of prick

yeah i heard about that minro accident thing on a old report back in the days, when jemery clarkson was on top gear (back in the quentin wilson days lol)

ive owned a 172 182 and ctr and foudn the ctr quicker through and through. not by alot, but defo quicker imo. i do prefer the 182 on corners though, bit easier to drive quickly. i ran 0.4 secs quicker at pod aswell, in simlar conditions :)

i brought a 182 wen i was 18 lol.

hehe cool vid

very nice lad, have fun with it!!