Search results

http://erc.qmuc.ac.uk/cliosport/gallery/full/1092409151__scratch001.jpg

If you want to do it properly use this with a rotary buffer http://erc.qmuc.ac.uk/cliosport/gallery/full/1092409267__scratch003.jpg

Laser will only target you if the old bill think you are speeding. If you were doing the speed limit it is unlikly they would laser you! Try buying a cheap laser pen from gadget shop and testing your unit

did you win a cloth mcshug?

OMFG MINE IS ON TEHRE AND I DIDNT KNOW!! THE FRONT ON CUP!! sorry stop shouting now!!

Actually Im talking sh*t:oops: mk1 is 5.8 and 17.1 to 100 and mk2 is 5.8 and iirc 15.5 to a 100 so 60-100 times are 11.3 for mk1 and 9.7 for mk2

clio 172 Power at Flywheel (BHP) 172 Weight without Driver (KG) 1110 Drive Type Front Wheel Drive (FWD) Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 157.44 0-60mph (Secs) 6.89 0-100mph (Secs) 18.26 60-100mph (Secs) 11.37 Quarter Mile (Secs) 15.32 @ 91.58 MPH...

Clio 182 Power at Flywheel (BHP) 182 Weight without Driver (KG) 1080 Drive Type Front Wheel Drive (FWD) Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 171.22 0-60mph (Secs) 6.43 0-100mph (Secs) 16.62 60-100mph (Secs) 10.19 Quarter Mile (Secs) 14.85 @ 94.50 MPH...

clio 172 cup Power at Flywheel (BHP) 172 Weight without Driver (KG) 1021 Drive Type Front Wheel Drive (FWD) Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 171.17 0-60mph (Secs) 6.44 0-100mph (Secs) 16.80 60-100mph (Secs) 10.36 Quarter Mile (Secs) 14.87 @ 94.08 MPH...

clio 182 cup Power at Flywheel (BHP) 182 Weight without Driver (KG) 1060 Drive Type Front Wheel Drive (FWD) Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 174.45 0-60mph (Secs) 6.34 0-100mph (Secs) 16.33 60-100mph (Secs) 10.00 Quarter Mile (Secs) 14.75 @ 95.04 MPH...

The difference is the 60-100 times the mk2 does it in about 9 secs and the mk 1 in a whopping 13 secs!

check autocar;)

fully agree they saved money and then re weighed the car and thought ah I have amarketing scam up my sleeve!!

Before I get accused of sour grapes I fully accept that the 182 cup will be faster than the cup (sorry 172cup now!) It just seems however that Renault are watering down the cup brand. The 172 cup was a more track focused version of the std 172 with a useful 89kg less weight and wider...

I will be interested to see what the evo lot make of it. It will be a great car as it is a 182 but swapping a 182 interior for a dynamique interior saves a scant 20kg is this really worth it?

^^^ he cant even string a competent sentence together let alone dream about owning any clio!

Hes probably got the lad 200 cup the cheap way for a 200bhp cup;)

or air con;) tbh a saving of 20kg for a crappy interior is hardly worth it imo i love the cup brand but i dont believe this does it any justice! If i was to buy a 182 it would be the 182 sport with cup options rather than the 182 cup Still technically speaking it will be the fastes 2...

well done Mcshug I have been trying to get on there too :( nice piccy btw

I keep my cup for dry use/weekends only tbh I wouldnt fancy using it this winter w/o abs etc and was glad of my golf gti with aircon this summer.

Very subtle The number of people who try it on with my cup and then look so shocked when they get blown to pieces by an ickle clio ffs its a girls car for shopping lol!

Eves has just bought a 172 after a willy!

LMAO^^^@martin [Edited by brazo on 13 September 2004 at 11:28pm]

I think the willy deserves that title!

Given his extensive knowledge of the williams he must be right LMAO

:confused: B roads master the williams was! 172 would have edge on track

er................NO........ Williams had fook all to do with this great car bar the naming!

Polish twice a year wax once a week! Cant really add anything to this thread as meguirs has already been mentioned!

It depends If you want to be covered by your insurance tell them If you wish to drive around without insurance dont tell them!

Just looked out my window its about right!