Search results

I can't get on with the idea of the cup. Lose weight, great. Best colour, perfect wheels, just spot on. But why delete abs? It's a stupid, stupid ommission, it's a genuine benefit in an emergency.

I genuinely have no idea what that means?

I have, thanks. As I said, they are fast. Very. But it's a boring engine imo. The limited power range, the noise, it's all dull for me. And the 335 is hardly economical, get the petrol!

17's? Lowered? Book a chiropractor 1st.

Tester's discretion iirc

Repeat 100 times: "It's only a 1.2"

Meh, diesel. Quick, but no enjoyment in it for me. Can see the appeal on that type of car though.

Drill a hole in each piece, cable tie them together.

Has the mount snapped, or has the clip come off?

mytyres. Not the cheapest, but they could get them

Of all the 1*2's, the only one that feels massively different is the Trophy. All the others are much of a muchness.

You can fella, I got some a few weeks ago. There's just very little supply.

I've had 2 of each, there's nothing in it. It's a french 10bhp don't forget.

I'm the opposite. Wouldn't put T1r's on if they were free. Average in the dry, poor in the wet. http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Article/2009-Auto-Zeitung-Summer-Tyre-Test.htm Bottom out of 16 tyres tested:dead:

As above, I'd get the 205's. I've only used the V12's and the RS2's, couldn't comment on the others.

Currently running some kind of ditchfinder? Stunners etc!

http://www.camskill.co.uk/products.php?plid=m12b0s662p4057 If you can get them lol! Bit pricier, but so, so good for the money. Demand for them is huge, so I'd keep calling camskill. Much cheaper than the equiv r888, but you can easily use them on road (even when wet!) if needed. I'm running...

I'd buy them over pe2's even if the pe2's were cheaper. Best road tyre I've used. Edit: But if you get them, run them a slightly lower pressure than pe2's.

Shame they are T1-R's! These are vastly better, only £12 more. http://www.camskill.co.uk/products.php?plid=m4b0s99p15202

And it wasn't this decade ?

Trophy of the ones I've driven. I've not driven anything more fun on a quiet b road.

I'd check it on an rstuner if possible. Mine didn't show any errors on a code reader, but had a stored error that the rstuner picked up.

I had exactly the same, intermittent misfire, only under heavy load. Turned out to be the lambda. If you've tried that already, and given it's smoking etc, I'd get it comp tested. Can't think of anything to try before that.

Speak to Fred. There's a guy in Birmingham he recommended to me (can't remeber his name) that I used, was excellent.

+100 tbh.

Re: Whats this Clio worth? £5k-ish. Blueflame h'actually lowers the value ;)

Can you read? I've already said in an earlier post that I don't want a slow car, but the standard is quick enough for what it is. I give up, a you clearly aren't bright enough to understand that I don't feel more power won't make it a better, more fun car. I'll leave you to it.

You're missing my point entirely. Yes, it's fast. But fwd is a lot easier to drive than rwd. There's no challenge. Fun, up to a point. But once you reach that point, more power won't make it more fun. I'd rather drive a 1.8 mx5 than a 400bhp Clio. So far I've spent about £1000 on...

I'd rather spend the money on track days and tuition. I will never, ever, ever want to spend 4k on making a 4pot, fwd shopping trolley fast in a straight line. Especially one with a fairly basic setup and no LSD. Not gonna happen. You posting vids of a Clio that's fast in a straight line won't...

Really? http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1406883.htm All that vid shows is that it's quick in a straight line. Great. As I've said, but people clearly have trouble reading lol, is that being quick in a straight line, does nothing for me. No, I don't want a slow car, but the standard car is...