Search results

Peasants tyre IIRC. ;)

The petrol thing would make sense. High insurance group cars tend to guzzle gas, those that drive lots tend to pay more anyways. Would have the added benefit of encouraging people to go for lighter, more economical motors, which the government should like.

There's a few vids I've seen of it. In general they aren't that accurate, the hardware isn't good enough! The gtech itself isn't meant to be great!

Some amreican fellas did a test, none of the acceleramoter based phone systems are that accurate.

Have the belts been done yet? Could be lowest mileage failure if not!

Maybe they should of found some extra ponies and not worries so much about the shell, given that it doesn't translate to a faster car ;). Oh wait they did. The 200!

Splitter?

But didn't yours have coilovers and an aftermarket exhaust?

The 182 would be more fun to drive, but the seat will be better built, and give better mpg. But the seat is not quicker.

I don't drive fast enough to roll, and fixed seats would piss me off day to, so I won't be getting a cage. For a dedicated track toy, 100% would though.

What? Is this another thread for owners to self congratulate themselves over their purchase?

Have you checked insurance? Cups are trickier to insure than normal 172's.

Then 172 kit fits.

I have a race system on, fantastic. Faultltess build, fits perfectly, and light! Whereabouts are you based?

I would of thought that if the ride quality is getting worse, dampers are on the way out. What use does it get? Track?

Sounds like beefy? Ph1 or 2?

Yep, photo's arent needed, you can't miss them!

I always put them on the front. Newest on the driven wheels, the Clio tends to understeer, not oversteer. But there's no right/wrong answer, different 'experts' will give different opinions.

Look after it, this was mine after less than 6months Despite brushing it up every few weeks.

No, it's not. Cheap, because they're badly made. Yozza.

Mine aren't as low as poss though

Would look stupid IMO. Pointless.

I'd turn the sound off before watching.

Looks nice for what it is. Wouldn't spend any more cash on it, save for an upgrade.

Approx 1k to buy. If they're an option you're welcome to a drive of mine fella.

I don't think there would be a huge margin between most of the kits. As said, it's more about the feeling and balance you prefer.

I will be, if I still have a Clio! Mines setup to be a bit tail happy. Max stiff on the rear+whiteline arb, just off softest on the front. Same toe out as the trophy.

If you're up brum way, welcome to have a shot. Dan, the new kit maybe better, I can only and will only comment on the kit I've tried. And that was the kit sold to me by Curtis, after I explained my needs and useage. If he didn't get it right, what conclusions am I expected to draw?

Let's be honest, there's a few people on here that have experience of racing, suspension development etc. I've not heard a positive comment re ast from many (any?) of them. I'm sure of you have the time/money/inclination they could produce a cracking kit. Out of the box, mine didn't work, on...

Plus one on the ast's. They aren't shocking, but they aren't right out of the box. Dan won't hear a bad word said about ast, he'll deny the setup could be better, dent there's a problem with the rear adjuster, deny the plastic rear collar was an issue. What bothers me is that they knew the rear...