Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
On a ph1, the fit is very poor. The ph2 bumper hides it completely, but you can still see a lot of exhaust with the ph1 bumper. Most likely a recessed prospeed.
Lack of steering adjustment would annoy me in the cup. I liked the way you could have plenty of legroom up front in the standard 197, and still have the wheel nice and close.
Exactly my point. I imagine that when the current Clio is discontinued, the 197 will be the bottom of a good bunch. Still good, just surpassed by the updates, as happened with the Meg, the 172 through to Trophy etc.
Fair enough, the only person that needs to enjoy your car is you. But, every neutral review I've read when they've gone head to head has come out in the Trophy's favour. I don't understand the big issue that people have with other people's opinion of a car?
Exactly. It's like saying a basic 3 series with cloth interior is the runt of the range. Still a great car, but the comment holds true.
It looks hideous, but that wouldn't put me off.
They won't listen! Even Mr Trophy (ie, me) is admitting that, at the moment, it appears the 200 is a big step up from the Trophy. I'm pretty sure the drive will confirm this.
There's a shock.
The ph2 172 is the runt of the range you fool, not a runt full stop. Still a great hot hatch but for the mk2 clio's
Tropy>182>172ph1>172ph2. Ergo, runt of the range.
Thats out of date fella. When they changed the configuration of the circuit evo took a stack of cars over. Dry and hot day, drove the 197cup straight after the Trophy. The Trophy was something ridiculous like 0.2s quicker. The 200 ruins them both, I can't wait to have a drive.