Search results

lol @ the one owner bit! looks a bit rough i hate people that try and sell cars without giving them a few hours tlc! i hate them nearly as much as i hate people that drive cars without mats!

haha na its mint, always warmed up before hammered and always left running for a few minutes when it had been driven hard, plus apart from the front end being full of stone chips, or should i say stone holes the rest of the car is imaculate!

thats because its not webmail its downloading them onto your new computer.

ill stick the 192 on, erm i mean 200!

deffo not the head gasket?

yes fully specced dci, 20k of hard hard miles and the fronts were just becoming illegal, rears were a fair bit worn and needed front brakes, so i traded it for the 200 rather than replace lol

Nokia N8, yeah gonna have a little play about with it tomorrow!

a play about with the panoramic setting on my phone, first time ive used it so pretty s**t lol

isnt a massive deal in it until your up above 90mph the 350 has the legs.

your perfectly within your own right to form your opinion, just as well your opinions wrong or id have wasted £14,700 lol

nothing wrong with the steering it feels like a very slightly lighter version of the 200 brakes are more than up to the job suspension/chassis is its party piece, coilovers would just ruin it gearbox is fine unless you dont know how to use a clutch you may have issues driving possition again...

if the performance and fuel consumption doesnt bother you then they are still an extremely nice car in petrol if its got a few options on it. they are well built, nice place to be, cruise control as standard, but they arnt worth it over a 197/200 for running costs, unles as i said above its a...

sure there is a knob on the side of the dashboard when you open the door

am i the only one that found falklands results spot on? everyone was running around what was expected?

DCi106!

apparently ford were doing new shape Ka's for something silly like £69 a month, citroen were doing something similar on their aygo like thing!

if you can do it youself, get an engine for a couple hundred quid and get it remapped for less than 300, your paying £500 for over 15bhp and around 20lbft, not bad for an N/A car bhp per £

as long as the car is no older than 5yrs when the term finishes as far as i know so yes as long as its upto 2yrs old

my old one...

needs to be a diesel. they are awesome i had one for a year. 1.6 16v petrol is gutless and no cheaper to run than the RS 1.5 DCi has bags of torque, its bullet proof, does 55mpg daily.

you sure ;)

straight swap engine and remap 1.4 ecu. done!

i think its probably to make it easier to drive around town at slow speeds, as it is as mark says a bit better higher up the rev range. its more like driving a cable throttle car when using heel and toe you have to give it a proper stab, my GT with the same pedal setup had razor sharp throttle...

162lbft on a standard engine am i reading that correct? lol

im game for another RR, id like to go back to falkland as most of us have been before so it gives more consistent results to compaire to and there rollers read spot on, or atleast for most of us! until we broke them lol

im with scott. throttle responce is shocking on it, not sure if its something that can be mapped out

my W, 51, 02, 03, 53 & 54 plate were all 17mm hex with a torx centre lol! bit of penetrating fluid on the bolts from the underside of the car, leave for 5 minutes and remove, either that or impact gun! once removed, refit the bolts or you will have a leaking car lol!

seems to be a bit issue with the internet these days, instead of a decent in depth convo it turns into childish name calling lol!

hit the nail on the head