Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I love these threads....no wonder no ones goes on Williamsclio forum, your all here defending your cars.....
I wonder how fast the 182 are when they have 100k and 3 rebuilds....will have to wait and se..
Again we get the dreaded thread..!
The only credible video evidence that has been forwarded is the Yozza cup vid v Wliiams, this clearly shows that a Williams with IK/exhast/ECU is a fraction quicker than a standard cup. A cup with the same level of mods then the cup would be quicker. This vid...
For me if you carnt afford to run a car and replace or maintain it with good quality gear get rid....! He obviously did.
Get them swopped, dangerous in this weather and you will be amazed at the difference..
You have got the Gaz very low so 17" may have rattled your teeth.
For me in 16" the Anthracite turini is the best looking wheel for 172/182...LOL just like mine..!:rasp:
http://www.cliosport.net/index.php?ind=gallery&op=foto_show&ida=76...
You have a few options-
17inch Supperleggras(or other wheel) with 205/40 tyres RR only a tiny bit more than what you have now so should be ok. Think im going this route.
16inch wheel may look small as your 182 wheel are an optical illusion and look big. Tyres size i would stay the same...
Agree they are shite at the moment..
600 last year with exhaust and suspension, this years renewal 1000....!
They said its a high risk car and the mods were 250...fucked them off and everywhere else was cheeper. Car in with mods 600 done and dusted.
Doubt it i have a pm for 450 for my refurb turini's no tyres....:approve:
Personnally i would say 700.....
Well atleast until i sell mine then they should be worth 200 max.....:D
Had an IS200 sport as a company car 5/6 years ago, great car all the gadgets, great stereo, entertaining handling (LSDin the sport) engine made all the right engine noises but very very poor performance and awful mpg (23 average) from a 2.0....... But for the money at the time they were a bargin..