Search results

depends how good your stock ones are tbh, some are ok and some are shocking but its an improvement either way. Mine were v.good and I still noticed a differance with my matched ones. Just dug out the rolling road thread. He didn't have a re-map or matched inlets so fingers crossed you would...

A while back somone with similar mods had theres on the dyno and made 185 bhp. Things I cant remember is if it was mapped and if there inlets were matched. But hey defo had 182 manifold, de-cat, cat back and filter

possibly break the 190's but id be surprised to be honest. Its not just the bhp figure its the torque figure too

at a guess your more of a braking demond then cornering demond

I assume you already have a cat back btw. but at the end of the day its not a massive gain. But the car will respond much better and rev a lot more freely

ideally you would get a re-map also. With a re-map you could see the high 180's without the low 180's at a guess

vredesteins are a good tyre, give great feedback.

I personally dont see the point in coilies unless there going to be constantly ajusted threw out there life. 9 out of 10 people get them set up and leave them as be. Some decent shocks like koni ajustables and springs lowering your car to height you want and pocket the rest

I would personally use angel works. They CNC machine theres where as most do them by hand so better finish and more accurate with CNC http://www.angel-works.co.uk/

Thanks. I've heard people say on here there not needed, but I wasnt convinced

the big thing that sits over the top of your engine is an inlet and they are poorly fabricated at factory so to get the most from them you can get them matched. Mine used to struggle past 110mph when it was completly standard now it see's 130ish ok on a private run way near me

looks good. Did you lower it yourself? just wondered if you need a spring compressor on the fronts?

mine pops like a mo-fo with just a cat back. Got de-cat on order so will report back if you like.

got mine fitted too, in the rain. But I removed front bumper, which I can imagine made it a hell of a lot easier

got it all fitted. IMO if you have you want a smaller feed then 76mm dosnt fit inside the air box hole so I've siliconed it to the bottom feed on the outside. Was going to mount it to side feed but cant due to battery being in standard position. Also removed the carbon canistor. Im thinking fog...

depends what you can get them for dave ;)

yer, think ill be getting 2118's in the summer. thanks guys

thought it looked like it had a bit of a face lift. Apologies for not being clued up on jap motors

no problem

so theres not many funny jokes out in the country lol

the one with a turbo'd 172 with a 75 shot of nitrous lol

is that the 14th anniversary btw? am I rite its the only one they do in white . . .

pornographic. End of

cant stand any of the smart range to be perfectly honest, like you say they just look plastic. And a lot of them look like the sort of thing a OAP would drive

basicly its the same style as what the BTCC cars are running. Nothing confirmed on figures or cost yet. But is going to be a hell of a lot cheaper then ITB's. Heres the link for you to follow progress http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?t=404848

yer will find you link, hold on

you deserve a 1point fine for posting up an indecent picture there my friend in accordance to the new rules! Yuck!

is it really? in that case you should smoke him. Less frictional loss for fwd FTW

be worse for the 172 getting off the line

do it then lol. There is a new inlet manifold that is under development that uses the standard ecu that is said to give 95% of the power gain of ITB's