Search results

This will sound a daft question (i know nowt about turbos so excuse) but the GTT is quoted at 115/120bhp as standard. Is this figure on-boost and what is the power off boost?

Torry Battery Point? *cough* bufty alert *cough cough* ;)

what 911 though?

Think he meant the mk1 with graphics further down the page

GTT as theyre a classic and rare - dont get me wrong as the c16v will eventually reach that kind of status but IMO the GTT is just a bit different...

Quality!! Look pretty much identical to the rear of EPs twin engined example - is there kinda like a known conversion for the subframe/suspension etc now?? Hats off for doing that himself though!

Holy christ!! Any pics of that??

thank you. How is the cabin noise with it stripped like that and do you have condensation problems in cold weather?

As above, has anyone got any stripped 172 pictures? Preferably a phase 1 thanks!

I would say a little bit less than a GTT of similar condition so maybe 2/2.5k?

They arent seat covers - thats the std interior with some red leather retrimming.

Could still be a proper GTT despite the 1.7 point - IIRC Prima do a 1.7 turbo conversion to up the capacity. However, my money is on it being a fake as the mirrors should be colour coded too...id be interested to know how far shes taken it beyond the GTT interior and exterior as its still very...

they look gay IMO

PX DIET IK; http://www.coded-solutions.com/car/misc_pics/diet_ik.jpg

I agree. If everything was fine until you phoned then id say something has happened to it (i.e some monkey will have dented it parking it etc) and theyre trying to cover their arses. Probably nowt you can do though...

As above, would like to see what kits you use and were they are located in the bay etc. This is for a mk2 1.2 8v or a mk1 phase 3 both with the DIET engine btw... Thanks!

Check the plug going onto the ISCV - mine unclipped itself causing the effects you describe...not nice coming towards a RA at 90!

youre not running them off that poor tape deck i take it?! ;)

Looking good - id be tempted to stick some phase 1 lights back on though and get the willy front track on it. Nice

There no contest between the two IMO...it far more stable and you can corner way way way faster.

No need to tell insurance about the R19 arms etc

Defo the the williams. I wouldnt say the 172 (in any guise) is inferior...far from it...its just that with a williams setup you get the feeling that no matter what speed you arrive at a corner youre going to make it round.

Only had them on for 5 days - bought them for the 1.2 but they slowed it down too much! :oops:

Glad your happy with them - they will look very tidy with the red! :D

Mine from many moons ago...and yes i took the rubbish ecotek and K&N off shortly after that was taken! http://www.coded-solutions.com/car/misc_pics/ecotek.jpg

well im still trying to contact the seller but for those interested, they appear to be in black

hmm, just done a scan of quad conversions site - seems theres a delay in the re-release but theyll still be about 260quid if you go new...

Folks, a kiddy near me (scotland) is selling her clio and its got some afterburners on it. These seem to be in demand as you can no longer buy them so, assuming i could buy them, would anyone be wanting to buy them? Also, if you would what would be expecting to pay? Theyre currently in black.

Well its the williams track i want again so itd to mean buying the parts anyway, regardless of wether it goes onto this or a valver. Way i see it is that id be better sticking with this as its got zero rust and low milage - to find a valver in similar condition would cost and doesnt seem worth...

Well the valver engine limits me to an expensive 160-odd brake and ive been there and done that. True, the williams handling on my 16v was the best ive experienced yet but theres nothing to stop me fitting that to this car...plus ive always wanted a GTT so this is kinda the best of both worlds...