Search results

Just a decat aircon removed then fully stripped.. There is somemore things we are thinking about but thats all for the moment.

http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?t=364943&page=9 Have a look at our ITB graph on there.

Take weight out is the only sensible way of doing it. Our track car is at over 225 per ton, but that has 202bhp and weighs less that 910KGs

Not a chance the GSIs are rapid compared to a 1,4 clio, iven the Old 1.4 16V SRI corsa s are quicker than a clio. Nothing at all in a 1.2 v1.4 clio, very little differance.

Just keep a eye on the trackdays section and when me and carl book a croft dayim sure there would be time to give 1 or 2 passanger lifts in the racing blue. :P

Paintballing man, Geddes, hutchie + sam Vz ALL

Bah thats nothing our PH1 gets 99.9MPG according to the computer......... which doesnt work with the omex. :<

Ours used to do the exact same thing, poor mans cruise control!

Nandos meet Mark pays ??? good option imo.

clio discussion........

Durham Car park meet over my easter break.....Gogo Mark you like chatting up that lass there.

Looking good except for hutchies stupid front bumper stickers!

Track toy :D:D:D

Could not deal with it on a road car, our track car is impossible to see out of the back as soon as the roads are wet :< You taken the whole motor out aswell or just the blade?

Yeah its like 1hour 20minutes ish. You would have to check his site or PM him on here, (PMURRAY) is his user name. We have just had out ITB'd track car done so was more expensive than a normal map due to the work.

We always use Paul at RStuning not a bad word can be said abou him and his work, very helpful and knows his stuff, also has a Reputation 2nd to none in renault tuning :D

Doing a RR before and after ?

never heard of them how much they charging ?

Idd giving the GF the cup :<

That is Ace, :D made me laugh

2900 erm, No. I would consider something cheaper to insure for a year again even if it is a step backwards. You must have some cash if your able to buy a 9k car then think about insuring it with that premium though.

I have a RStuner on mine, and although ppl say 8-10 im still doubtful on it. Feels slightly faster because things are done low down on the revs, and the 5K is more smooth but i dont believe the predictions.

see 146 ATW using 17% is abouy 170 ATF. from 146 - 183 is like 25/6%

Tbh i would ask Tupps (sure ur friends with him) to have a look at his graph see what his wheel figure is, cos IIRC he had 183 at the fly for a near standardish car. See what % they used to calculate his at fly figure, would not suprise me if they had used a large % agen on his.

Well the wheel figure is going to be the most accurate. so 131.6 + 25 0r 30 ish. Front wheel drive is normally calculated at 17% trans loss IIRC, (awaits Matt fred or another Guru to correct me.

Im confused how do i get mine ?

As said in the other thread, im always a bit funny with motorscope results, but in comparison to others from there looks like a healthy result. Agreed with the ATW and Fly figures though, but i feel that all motorscopes at the Fly figures are calculated really high

Largest aperture you can massive exposure and a very low ISO + tripod and remote :D

Sure Matt or paul will explain to you. can not rmember exactly what pauls PH1 made standard on his rollers IIRC, it was 160ish there fore our car is soing a +20 gain, which is what ia said you would expect from them mods. If you want to be stuck in your ways feel free. All im saying is that we...

Well you dont understand what those cams are then. 420s are a standard cam basically.