0-60

[watty]

does anybody no the 0-60 time of a standard 182 ive seen so many different times ranging from 6.3 to 7.4 jus wondered what the real time was so once ive had some work done to the car i can compare it to standard!

 

[bmh.01]

6.9iirc

 

[col182]

7.1 iirc

 

[col182]

http://www.renaultsport.co.uk/roadcars/heritage/clio182/information.asp

 

[AlexS]

I thought the ph1's were 6.9 and the 182's were 7.1.

 

[ForceIndia]

Autocar road test, got a genuine 6.3 out of a 182.

 

[watty]

lol 2 different times already what does renault say?
i hope it is 6.3!!!

 

[ForceIndia]

Sorry, 6.4!! http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/FirstDrives/Renault-Clio-2.0-16V-Renaultsport-182-Cup-/211587/

 

[daviebroon]

yeah... 7.1 deffo.

172cups are something like 5.2 just for comparitive measures

 

[ForceIndia]

AAAAHHHHHH!!! It's 6.3 http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/RoadTestsData/Renault-Clio-2.0-16v-Renaultsport-182-/207401/

 

[182joe]

yeah... 7.1 deffo.

172cups are something like 5.2 just for comparitive measures

5.2????

i thought

phase 1/2 172 = 7.1
182 = 6.9
172 cup = 6.7

 

[watty]

i cant believe its 7.1 when driving it def feels sub 7 secs and my celica toyota claimed 7.4 i did it in 6.8 ?

 

[daviebroon]

Sorry, 6.4!! http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/FirstDrives/Renault-Clio-2.0-16V-Renaultsport-182-Cup-/211587/

well for a start it says 6/9 in that, not 6.4... but that seems a load of shite anyway. Says 84% of 172cup owners opted for air con??

 

[ForceIndia]

Using this forums standards (boster being a poor mans porsche), surely the 172cup is a poor mans 172!?!

 

[daviebroon]

yeah... 7.1 deffo.

172cups are something like 5.2 just for comparitive measures

5.2????

deffo 5.2.... haven't you seen the write ups on here?

 

[172.com]

I heard the 172 cup was 4.3.

 

[Tom]

i heard -18

 

[ForceIndia]

Sorry, 6.4!! http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/FirstDrives/Renault-Clio-2.0-16V-Renaultsport-182-Cup-/211587/

well for a start it says 6/9 in that, not 6.4... but that seems a load of s**te anyway. Says 84% of 172cup owners opted for air con??

2nd link is the road test with the figures that they record themselves. Everyone knows racing blue is worth 15bhp (minimum).

 

[col182]

well for a start it says 6/9 in that, not 6.4... but that seems a load of s**te anyway. Says 84% of 172cup owners opted for air con??

2nd link is the road test with the figures that they record themselves. Everyone knows racing blue is worth 15bhp (minimum).

knowsit

 

[Chris n nic]

Well my cup got 5.39 0-60







Not 100% standard tho

Chris

 

[sparky182]

Warm rubber warm dry road. not much fuel in the tank and no passangers.

Low 6 seconds

cold wet day with cold wet rubber. 12 seconds lol

 

[172.com]

Did you count the seconds in your head?

 

[Rudi]

normal 182-7.1. its trophy's and 172 cups that are 6.9

 

[kully]

theres so many different figures about , only way really to find out is to DO it

 

[Iridium]

I heard that doing a 0-60 run on a cup was pointless because it was too hard to gauge such a small time accurately... 0-155 is a better measure IMHO.

Dan

 

[kully]

^^^^^ not funny :lolup:

 

[LegoHead]

never at the moment
4.5 when fixed.lol.

 

[FlameR]

some say that the cups acceleration is so severe you can't do a quarter mile drag race due to the power ripping the tyres to pieces.

It has only been achieved once with the following stats records:

0-60 1.24 secs
1/4 mile 4.35 seconds @ 163.87 mph

 

[deanf06]

some say that the cups acceleration is so severe you can't do a quarter mile drag race due to the power ripping the tyres to pieces.

It has only been achieved once with the following stats records:

0-60 1.24 secs
1/4 mile 4.35 seconds @ 163.87 mph

LOL!!!!:lolup:

 

[Dcds4]

the original ph1 172 lit from renault says 6.4 or 6.6 cant remember as its at home with my service history, its defo lower than what it says everywhere else, the price is 15995 also, also has a clio exeecutive with full leather, air con, electric sunroof and more at about 14k

 

[Ian_182]

A lot depends on the driver of the car

 

[Clioman51]

Oh dear a lot of people are confusing 0-60 with 0-62 (100km) on the renault site it's say 7.1 -62 but its 6.9 to 60

 

[Evil Ally]

Official Renault 0-62 figures are 7.1 for the FF and 6.9 for the Cup and Trophy, however most road tests seem to suggest both are faster than this.

 

[FlamingMonkey]

Cup haters

Williams for the Win

 

[M40 CUO]

I thort it was

172 = 7.1
182 = 6.8
172 cup = 6.7

 

[IvanDrago]

normal 182-7.1. its trophy's and 172 cups that are 6.9

7.1 for a FF182?

Autocar have tested a 182 at 6.3 seconds, have a look. EVO 6.5 seconds. Seems about right for a fwd car making over 160bhp/ton.

 

[Timmay]

mine goes 0-60 in 2.5



shes a beast

 

[evolution]

does anybody no the 0-60 time of a standard 182 ive seen so many different times ranging from 6.3 to 7.4 jus wondered what the real time was so once ive had some work done to the car i can compare it to standard!

if your planning on comparing it with your own car after mods, perhaps the best idea is to strap a v-box on yours, and measure it yourself?

times seem to be varying, whether its down to engine looseness or what, who knows, but for your purposes, the most accurate test of how your mods are affectin the car wud be best to test it yourself?

 

[gaz44]

A lot depends on the driver of the car

How fat they are?

The Cup brings out the best in people, hence the quick 0-60! Mine is about 5.02 secs I reckon.

 

[kully]

i've got mine close to six but not timed it .