1.6 16v dynamique owners

[Oakley]

So will I be spanking the VTRs then do you think!

Wouldnt mind seeing the 1.2s down the strip as they hold a special place in my heart!

Chris (Ex 1.2 16v)

 

[R3OBC]

wi this airbox mod im doing u would hear it too!!!!!!!

 

[Oakley]

You could go into production of them, Buy em from Renault, saw the top off, affix chicken wire, bobs your uncle, Sell them for more than a viper!!!

 

[R3OBC]

lol, nah, be too scared of warranty jobs! irrate customers comin back to me! lol. lots of interest in it tho. get pics up once i get it meshed n cold-air-fed

 

[172man]

parkers is complete LAmE. a 172 7.9 to 60 who test drove it parkers granny!

 

[Tom]

7.9!! lol!!

 

[Oakley]

I think parkers just put down what the manufacture tells them. All the clios seem to be at least 1 second faster than they have got down.

 

[SAX_MAN]

No, you wont be spanking VTRs, their power to weight is the same as a 1.6 Dynamique so it will be close. And as for a Dynamique chasing a VTS!! I dont think so. VTSs do 15.9 1/4 miles as standard, not far off a 172!

I dont intend any of this to be hostile by the way, just stating facts.

 

[1.6 16v]

Ralphy vts is right. 1.6 16v clios are more vtr league then vts league.

I beat a vtr(not easily) over a decent straight stretch of road and he had an extra person in the car.

id love to get one in proper race conditions

 

[local]

I too have raced vtrs havent lost to one yet, raced a vts as well got beat what can i say lighter, car 10 more bhp nippy little car!

 

[Dynamic Devil]

Can any of you explain how my clio can stay infront of my mates Mitsubshi FTO?? (Up to about 70mph that is, then he passes me) His car has a 2.0L V6 engine (197BHP) de-catted, and an induction kit.

My clio engine wise is totally standard??

 

[Stubod]

Have come up against about 4 different VTRs over the last year or so and the same thing happens every time, 1st and 2nd not a lot in it , then top of 2nd (55-60) start to gain/make a slight distance from VTR, 3rd gear BYE! and yes,suprisingly it is has been that dramatic every time, I suppose this is where the bit of extra 20/12bhp does its bit. Dont know really, because the VTR is a heck of a lot lighter.

(Maybe they were all Westcoasts (1.4)!!, hope not, imagine the shame )

Oh and VTSs, definately quicker cars no doubt about it, but not by as much as I thought they would be, only come up against one though so Im reserving judgement for now because theres no telling whether he was really going for it like I was (probably thought I was a 1.2 and didnt bother!) Must say though I have been very impressed with what I have seen of Craggys VTS on the videos, shocked in fact!

stu

 

[local]

Raced a primera gt other night had it to 100 then it flew past me, also raced a 1 litre charade dead heat to 115, then i edged him. it may not be as quick as a vts or 106 gti, but its a quick car! going hunting for a zetec-s tonight going to whoop its ass.

we are the one down from the 172, renault could of at least give us 130-40 bhp!

 

[1.6 16v]

Cant remember the guys name but isnt there someone on here with 138bhp coming out of their 1.6?