Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Weird that i just found that post.. i had my car lowerd 35mm at the front last weekend, and the back is getting done this weekend, But i wasnt sure how much to lower it.. i think having them even will work the best.
The problem on an rt is that you cant stiffen the back in correspondance with the front so the handling will be dodgy anyway. Ideally you should get the back suspension from a valver or willy but ive no idea how much work that would involve.
http://www.daz-uk.com/cliosport/daz/side-140403.jpgwww.daz-uk.com/cliosport/daz/side-140403.jpg for a pic - Back is slightly higher than the front. If you dont want new shocks etc.. then I would do about the same - the handling is great..
As nick said "never" have the back lower then the front. If you have dropped the front 35m then i suggest the back should be about 20mm - 25mm. I dont know the physics behind it but a car which is slightly lowered at the front then the back will handel better then a car thats level. also very good for standing starts.. alot of people put bigger wheels on the rear to even the weight ratio under aceleration. My car is lower at the front then the back and it corners lovely.
ere my car is lowered 35mil at front and 35mil bak it looks lower but thats because the lower arch is set lower if u go of the sill my car is the same height all the way around here check my car only www.face-pic.com/wkdlad