http://www.slashgear.com/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii-official-02216487/
Looks class. I won't be able to warrant upgrading though :dapprove:
Looks class. I won't be able to warrant upgrading though :dapprove:
ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
5D MKiii Announced
- Thread starter Feirny
- Start date
JamesBryan
ClioSport Club Member
JamesBryan
ClioSport Club Member
Available to pre-order... only £2999 body only
More than double what I paid for my MKii. FFS.
JamesBryan
ClioSport Club Member
£3689 with the 24-105mm F4 L
I bought a 5D for £600 a few weeks ago, all the camera I ever need
Bargain. I paid around £1100 for my 7D 12 months ago.
jenic
ClioSport Club Member
Define cheap?
Wishful thinking imo, considering the price difference between the ii's and iii's
Marky_
ClioSport Club Member
182
Didn't realise they were this affordable now!I bought a 5D for £600 a few weeks ago, all the camera I ever need
Buying a new 50d a couple of years ago now seems silly
Oil Burner
I fail to see the desire. Besides peoples almost obsessive desire to buy new cameras.
Yes it is a great camera, however for what i (and most people) need, the 5dmk2 was perfect. ISO performance and resolution on the new camera is beyond what is needed (at least for most people).
Yes it is a great camera, however for what i (and most people) need, the 5dmk2 was perfect. ISO performance and resolution on the new camera is beyond what is needed (at least for most people).
JamesBryan
ClioSport Club Member
The autofocus of the MK3 would have been handy on the MK2 mind :dapprove:
I don't think that as many MkII owners will jump to a MkIII as they did from the classic to the 5DII. The price difference is just too much.
The 5D body used to be aimed at the pro, but could be justified by a hobbiest. Most people who won't earn on their shots would struggle to justify 3K on a camera body.
I would love the AF system though as it is the only thing that bugs and loses me shots occasionally.
The 5D body used to be aimed at the pro, but could be justified by a hobbiest. Most people who won't earn on their shots would struggle to justify 3K on a camera body.
I would love the AF system though as it is the only thing that bugs and loses me shots occasionally.
JamesBryan
ClioSport Club Member
Yeah, i agree Andy.
I think a lot of people went from the 5D to the 5D MK2 because of the HD video. Where as now, even though the 5D MK3 has the option of 60fps at 720p, you can get a 7D that does the same for a lot less.
I think a lot of people went from the 5D to the 5D MK2 because of the HD video. Where as now, even though the 5D MK3 has the option of 60fps at 720p, you can get a 7D that does the same for a lot less.
Plenty around at that price or less, I made sure I got a good one so paid £600 for it. Only problem is there are no short-cuts with lens (obviously with it being FF), it demands cash to be thrown at it.
yeah I was being a little flippant lol!
I'm still using a MK1 5D proffesionally as a freelancer.
That was just over a grand when it was new.
I work in another photographers studio atm so the daily is a Nikon D700,
I still haven't learnt what all the buttons and fuctions do. lol
That was just over a grand when it was new.
I work in another photographers studio atm so the daily is a Nikon D700,
I still haven't learnt what all the buttons and fuctions do. lol
Similar threads
