How necessary is this on a 182, I mean I'm running pretty much budget tyres on all fours, but I am unsure whether to fork out on some Michelin ps3. Will there be much difference in handling etc, nankangs are what I'm using at the moment and there pretty shocking in the wet.
My experience would say you only have four contact patches, ( if your wheels arent in the air, even for a split second.) You have already mentioned nangkangs lack of grip etc. Even if you dont exceed the grip level in normal driving, the one time you need all the grip it could really mean life or death. Or no accident.
Does more grip mean a driver can go faster safer on public roads, yes. But thats not what was intended ? i think its the safety margin we all need, and even in these hard times that must be worth it everytime.
The real debate is whether to drop down from michelin at10/10 to say a hankook at 7/10 which i use alot when price is (always) important. Nankangs 5/10
It has taken me so long to get this up it has all be said, hope it helps, mark
The tyre debate cant be over discussed.?? yes uniroyals i believe did well in 'which' magazine tests. Yes, grip the same front and rear always a good start. I do swop tyres front to rear,just to wear the rears out before they end up perished or hard, tyres do last 60000 plus on the back of some cars. It is then very important to check wear patterns and advise the owner of grip changes front to rear.
The industry standard as i under stand it, is best grip on the rear especially for front wheel drive. This is not immediately obvious why. Front end slip is much easier to control in extreme. Maybe not as much fun.
Clio V6?
mark
B---dy hell Gally i have just spotted your posts 22547 thats 96.35 posts on average per week. I just done 3 ever!
What kind of place says that? A place that wants to go out of business?
depends if you tootle about or give it some stick.
Nonsense.
I nearly binned the OH's 182 with crappy budgets on the back.
15/20mph on a roundabout in the wet, on my way to work. Turn in gently, SNAP oversteer. Wakey wakey, dab of oppo needed at 7am !
Ok, if you've not got the money for 'premium' tyres I can understand, but at the same time, saving a few quid now, is not worth it at all IMO. If I'd have slid out, or spun and hit someone, it would have cost me more than the difference in insurance premiums next year, let alone the PiTA that is being without a car.
i can see your point which is why i mentioned braking distances
BUT
id imagine 90% of the people on the roads run budgets and are fine. my mum, auntie, grandmother etc etc probably buy budgets and have never had problems. granted youre at an increased risk, but massively? not really if you 'tootle about'.
more expensive tyres are generally better, but to the general public john smith and joe bloggs who potter about town not in a noticable way imo.
Money ain't really an issue so baring that in mind, would you go for the hankooks over the ps3?
Probably Kwik s**t, they won't fit annything unless it's purchased from themselves.
Cheap tyres you die,better tyres you live.
meet in the middle and just buy rainsport 2s or something ? not expensive and there a good tyre