how does this set compare to the pms and Pro-am kit?
Not sure about the PMS, but the Pro-Am kit is also a plug and play item that has seen some failures.
Pro-Am then did improve the material and requested they be fitted in the setting that provides the least amount of stress on the ball joint extenders. Ive not seen/heard of another failure of the Pro-Am kit since, however that being said, i don't think many circuits have been open for people to use either.
The issue with the plug and play kits is the ball joint extenders use the same mechanical fit/features as the OEM ball joints. This relies on the strength of the knuckle as designed for the OE ball joints and load. The increased leverage provided by the aftermarket extenders puts significant stress on these areas and over time the OEM knuckles begin to oval and eventually allow hardware failure.
The Noothloop/Bridgecraft setup is the only setup that i know of that not only machines the bottoms of the hubs perfectly flay, but then threads the bottom knuckle so the ball joint extender is not only threaded in, but then machined for a relief once fitted and further clamped tight by the pinch bolt. This is probably the strongest non-welded connection possible and has no way for either component to move. I have seen images of rally accidents where the corners of the cars have been ripped off and the RCK still not fail.
Failure at this point would be absolute catastrophic, and you need 110% confidence in the components. For me, the NLC/BCM was the only choice.
Just my opinion.