i need reports generated for management on usage i.e. top offenders. Also reporting on average transport times and things of that nature.
After the exchange on a sbs goes over 16GB weird things happen, so reg had to take it up to 25GB. So we limit email space.
Or script?
generating reports on user mailboxs size/items etc etc etc
After the exchange on a sbs goes over 16GB weird things happen, so reg had to take it up to 25GB. So we limit email space.
Well, Ex 2003 SP2 removes the limitation and raises it to 75GB. You do need to edit the registry to get that large, but it runs perfectly fine. Default stays at 18GB, but the registry entry is a fully supported feature.
1GB of mail isn't really that much now is it? Heh.
Most of the SBS clients we have do get limited. The SBS Exchange does get the 16Gb limit then SP2 changed that to 75Gb. But if a user has over 1Gb of email they aint dealing with it properly to be honest. We do have exceptions with Server clients and Exchange seperately, but why have more than 1Gb of email, thats what the network drives are for.After the exchange on a sbs goes over 16GB weird things happen, so reg had to take it up to 25GB. So we limit email space.
Well, Ex 2003 SP2 removes the limitation and raises it to 75GB. You do need to edit the registry to get that large, but it runs perfectly fine. Default stays at 18GB, but the registry entry is a fully supported feature.
1GB of mail isn't really that much now is it? Heh.
Woodentop;4296072 He is using SBS so we can assume it is a small/medium company and 1gb of mail each is plenty.[/quote said:Very true, mostly moving to 3Gb though with the new exchange limit but it still a pain in the bum when users use email as a storage facility.
but why have more than 1Gb of email, thats what the network drives are for.
Very true, mostly moving to 3Gb though with the new exchange limit but it still a pain in the bum when users use email as a storage facility.
Very true, mostly moving to 3Gb though with the new exchange limit but it still a pain in the bum when users use email as a storage facility.
Why change to 3GB? 1GB is plenty. :rasp:
Microsoft love the 2GB recommendation.. although I'm sure they're just stuck on the old 2GB max PST file size stuff.
The real limit is just a trade between storage, backup times, SLA, number of users.. but then it gets boring
As soon as you archive off e-mails, you lose a lot of useful functionality.. but that's a different topic for a different thread for a different day
Anyway, like Mike said, MOM is the way.
Why change to 3GB? 1GB is plenty. :rasp:
Microsoft love the 2GB recommendation.. although I'm sure they're just stuck on the old 2GB max PST file size stuff.
The real limit is just a trade between storage, backup times, SLA, number of users.. but then it gets boring
As soon as you archive off e-mails, you lose a lot of useful functionality.. but that's a different topic for a different thread for a different day
Anyway, like Mike said, MOM is the way.
I'm all for 250Mb mail files - I've saved EVERY email I've received in the last 2 years (~40 legitimate business emails a day and ~100 personal) and I've only ever archived ONCE.
We use Lotus Scrotes, which is just the s**ttest email system in the world. Good at the rest of it, but s**t at email.
As Daz said, archiving off loses you functionality - although if you're intelligent you save any attachments you need off to your home folders/my documents/p**n collection and delete it from the email message.