T
thecremeegg
:rasp:
:rasp:
The bluray bit is in the middle of the exhibition. Theres only about 3 people actually watching, the rest are wandering around looking at other stuff..
I couldnt care less which one wins.
I was just pointing out your picture proves nothing.
Revels the whole picture is relating to BD technology, you can see that by looking at the big banner and all the listed BD partners showcasing BD stuff.
Cupwhite, people will always want optical media, sure downloadable content may increase in popularity amongst the tech savvy, but it's never going to take over. The day it does is the day everybodies contended boradband services fall on their arse and servers begin crashing.
Yup as I said before the quality is identical with both. The only difference is that one costs a lot more than the other.
Quite why people chose the most expensive I don't know. Sadly those muppets have now commited us all to buying the most expensive. Nice one.
Roll on the next recession as there is clearly too much money about.
exactly, its about time the better format won, sony always come up with the best but it never seems to win (like betamax and minidisc etc.)Its about time the better format won !
I just feel sorry for all the MS fans that bought the HD-DVD addons. But to be honest the 'add-on' drive was a stupid idea anyway it should have been in the console from day one like sony have done for the PS3.
exactly, its about time the better format won, sony always come up with the best but it never seems to win (like betamax and minidisc etc.)Its about time the better format won !
I just feel sorry for all the MS fans that bought the HD-DVD addons. But to be honest the 'add-on' drive was a stupid idea anyway it should have been in the console from day one like sony have done for the PS3.
Yup as I said before the quality is identical with both. The only difference is that one costs a lot more than the other.
Quite why people chose the most expensive I don't know. Sadly those muppets have now commited us all to buying the most expensive. Nice one.
Roll on the next recession as there is clearly too much money about.
Spot on mate...
Some people are really thick!!!!
Please learn something about the technology before making a judgement.
Blu-ray uses a lens with a greater numerical aperture than HD-DVD and as such can fit more data on the same size disc. Blu-ray can hold 25GB per layer (50GB on a dual-layer disc)
HD-DVD can only hold 15GB per layer (30GB on a dual-layer disc)
Blu-ray also has a higher data transfer rate (54Mbps vs 36.55Mbps) and HD DVD is just enough to fit a high-def movie.. what about the 3 hour ones or extra content... gonna swap disks half way through the movie ? Bluray also uses a lower data compression rate for audio and therefor has superior sound quality.
You really are sad, get a life man, i bet you rip one out to What HiFi magazine.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To some of the HD-DVD lovers.. Please learn something about the technology before making a judgement.
Blu-ray uses a lens with a greater numerical aperture than HD-DVD and as such can fit more data on the same size disc. Blu-ray can hold 25GB per layer (50GB on a dual-layer disc)
HD-DVD can only hold 15GB per layer (30GB on a dual-layer disc)
Blu-ray also has a higher data transfer rate (54Mbps vs 36.55Mbps) and HD DVD is just enough to fit a high-def movie.. what about the 3 hour ones or extra content... gonna swap disks half way through the movie ? Bluray also uses a lower data compression rate for audio and therefor has superior sound quality.
Blu-ray isnt more expensive tbh, buy a ps3 and you get a games console and blu-ray drive in one - thats what made DVD take off
HD downloads the way forward, why go out to the shop and buy a DVD/HD DVD/Blu Ray disk when you will be able to stream/download it, once this country gets its arse in gear with its BB services
Please learn something about the technology before making a judgement.
Blu-ray uses a lens with a greater numerical aperture than HD-DVD and as such can fit more data on the same size disc. Blu-ray can hold 25GB per layer (50GB on a dual-layer disc)
HD-DVD can only hold 15GB per layer (30GB on a dual-layer disc)
Blu-ray also has a higher data transfer rate (54Mbps vs 36.55Mbps) and HD DVD is just enough to fit a high-def movie.. what about the 3 hour ones or extra content... gonna swap disks half way through the movie ? Bluray also uses a lower data compression rate for audio and therefor has superior sound quality.
You really are sad, get a life man, i bet you rip one out to What HiFi magazine.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please learn something about the technology before making a judgement.
Blu-ray uses a lens with a greater numerical aperture than HD-DVD and as such can fit more data on the same size disc. Blu-ray can hold 25GB per layer (50GB on a dual-layer disc)
HD-DVD can only hold 15GB per layer (30GB on a dual-layer disc)
Blu-ray also has a higher data transfer rate (54Mbps vs 36.55Mbps) and HD DVD is just enough to fit a high-def movie.. what about the 3 hour ones or extra content... gonna swap disks half way through the movie ? Bluray also uses a lower data compression rate for audio and therefor has superior sound quality.
You really are sad, get a life man, i bet you rip one out to What HiFi magazine.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh another one!! piss off maggot
exactly, not sure why everyone keeps saying bluray is expensive, its like when everyone was saying the ps3 was expensive, if you look at it relatively it isn't.Blu-ray isnt more expensive tbh, buy a ps3 and you get a games console and blu-ray drive in one - thats what made DVD take off
BOOM!!!!Oh another one!! piss off maggot
hes a troll that likes to join in with these threads he knows nothing about and just slags off the people that do know what they are talking about and ends his posts with comments like BOOM!!!!.Oh another one!! piss off maggot
I just wondered who you thought you were thats all ?