Camber bolts

[Ph1 Tom]

Do you fit them in the top or bottom hole?

I know it's usually the top hole. The reason I ask is a friend fitted his in the bottom hole to get more camber adjustment.

 

[Fred@BTM]

well he's a pratt then

 

[Carbonraider]

You get my text mate..

As for the bolts I can't see you getting more camber being at the bottom. But I'd put them at the top..

 

[Ph1 Tom]

It worked. And it's been that way for 3 years.

 

[Mr R.]

well he's a pratt then

Yep, dont see how that works tbh.

 

[Ph1 Tom]

Might no be applicable to a Clio. It was on an old Fiesta so the way it mounts will most likely differ.

I'll go with the top hole anyway. Currently the car has 0 camber both sides, strange seeing as its on Cooksport springs. Anyway if I turn them to MAX either side will that be 1.5 or 1.75 degrees? I'm not sure what the adjustment range is on them.

 

[Fred@BTM]

upto 2.5 (which is 2.30 on the machine)

 

[Chip-mk1]

Yep, dont see how that works tbh.

You would just set it the opposite way around, so instead of tipping the top in you tip the bottom out.

 

[Carbonraider]

Should put 1 in the top and 1 in the bottom.. Why because racecar!

 

[Chip-mk1]

Should put 1 in the top and 1 in the bottom.. Why because racecar!

Assume you are joking but if you wanted more camber cause you are some scene kid who crawls around with their wheels looking like they might fall off then yes it would work, but I wouldnt recomend it as they are weaker then standard bolts and having neither positive located is likely to lead to issues.

 

[Carbonraider]

Assume you are joking but if you wanted more camber cause you are some scene kid who crawls around with their wheels looking like they might fall off then yes it would work, but I wouldnt recomend it as they are weaker then standard bolts and having neither positive located is likely to lead to issues.

you know I was joking. That idea would just be silly.

 

[Chip-mk1]

The VW/Euro scene boys do FAR worse mate!