Everything is a trade off.
Indeed, all about trial and error and finding what works best for your driving style and your car. Personally I like to rely as much on caster to introduce camber as you turn in as the setup of the car will allow me (most fwd hatchbacks are quite hard to get extra caster onto), and then only use static camber when I have to.
My comment is not made up.it's fact.
Apologies if you thought I was implying otherwise, wasnt my intention, im sure you are just commenting accurately on your experiences.
Sorry if you thought my reply a bit flippant but I was just giving an example of cars which do manage well on the brakes with a lot of camber as how you worded it really did make it sound like it would always be a bad thing braking wise to have even a couple of degrees of camber where as I doubt most people just doing trackdays would really notice it and when some people in racing thrive on it.
Im also sure your opinions as a racer are that things most of us would consider hardly having effected anything have from your point of view made a massive difference as invariably in close racing the odd tenth of a second a lap feels like a huge deal, where as on a trackday you dont even notice it.
Likewise on a trackday generally if a car brakes slightly worse but feels more stable through a bend it will be perceived as improved where as in racing if that means you got outbraked into the bend its not a good thing at all and it doesnt help that you could now potentially corner very slightly quicker if the person who outbroke you is in your way.
Very different disciplines im sure.