they all have issues no set is perfectPanasonic is better.
Panasonic is better.
Wow where did you get that from RN1?!?
Is it better than a Panasonic though, I keep hearing they are the best?
Less screen burn for the win tbh
Think you mean image retention tbh, it's near impossible to burn a modern plasma these days. I have to say the 590 suffers from very little retention and it goes very quickly when it does.
Here are to favorable reviews for the 590
http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/tvs/lg-pk590-50pk590-review-49305400/
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/lg-50pk590-60pk590-20100824823.htm
And the 3rd avforum thread. The other 2 are easy to find:approve:
http://www.avforums.com/forums/lg-forum/1340572-official-lg-pk590-plasma-thread-part-3-a.html
doesn't fade, they play their advert on it allday everyday and the LG's had burn. The staff told me as much and turned the set off, it was awful. Just cause you have an LG doesn't mean it's rubbish, you don't need to defend it, i'm just saying they do suffer from that, or at least the ones i looked at did...and yes it was only LG and yes it was ALL of them in currys digital purley - the massive one!
..maybe the news one have some new tech in them which stops it. It was importanbt to me as i play a lot of games, which have a fair bit of static stuff on screen.
lg and samsung are slightly worse than panasonics for image retention but the panny's are far from problem free. Panasonics suffer from false contouring/Posterization/Banding/Floating Blacks/Black mll rise Etc.