E91 M Sport
...so I required one of these 
ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
Clearly my 182 wasn't quick enough...
- Thread starter miketheman2k
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 182
Renault Clio 182
that is beautiful mike absolutely beautiful....
Christopher
ClioSport Club Member
Z4M
awesome.
enjoy!
enjoy!
Fletcher
ClioSport Club Member
Very nice
Renault Clio 16v
i want a mars red one, fookin love um
E91 M Sport
Thanks guys Yeah the silver mk2's aren't nearly as popular as they were for the mk1's - but its the classic V6 colour! (although I don't dislike any of the mk2 colours it has to be said)
Its titanium silver. Think the mk1's were iceburg silver which isn't quite as bright.
Yeah the silver mk2's aren't nearly as popular as they were for the mk1's - but its the classic V6 colour! (although I don't dislike any of the mk2 colours it has to be said)Its titanium silver. Think the mk1's were iceburg silver which isn't quite as bright.
renault clio 182 cup
what a good choice,very nice.....
Bye Bye 182....
I really like it. its fooking awesome! The only reason why I couldnt have one is because Id be scared to leave it in the Asda car park or worried that someone was going to damage it out of spite.
If I had a car like that id be running outside every two mins to check that some litle scroat hadnt keyed her!
Still very nice car!
If I had a car like that id be running outside every two mins to check that some litle scroat hadnt keyed her!
Still very nice car!
Renault Clio 1.4 RT
Looks very at home on your driveway! It's lush.
E91 M Sport
Thanks again for all the comments.
In comparison, well the interior is virtually the same (even got the same rattle by the cruise control switch lol)....the rest couldn't be more different. Where the 182 engine is smooth and peaky, the V6 is gruff, noisy and torquey. The handling on the 182 is light, agile and front heavy giving bags of lift-off oversteer, where as the V6 bobs up and down at the front with just so much rear-end grip. Obviously haven't tried provoking the rear yet, and to be honest it's not that sort of car.
Having had the mk1 last year its inevitable I'd make comparisons - I remember that feeling like it had good midrange pull, but not massively quick (not compared to the M Roadster), but this feels a lot quicker than my 182, and not far off the MR.
Even after having a mk1 before, its going to take a while to get used to the whuurs and clunks that the V6 makes in almost every situation. Its ok, I've been told that's what they're supposed to do....
In comparison, well the interior is virtually the same (even got the same rattle by the cruise control switch lol)....the rest couldn't be more different. Where the 182 engine is smooth and peaky, the V6 is gruff, noisy and torquey. The handling on the 182 is light, agile and front heavy giving bags of lift-off oversteer, where as the V6 bobs up and down at the front with just so much rear-end grip. Obviously haven't tried provoking the rear yet, and to be honest it's not that sort of car.
Having had the mk1 last year its inevitable I'd make comparisons - I remember that feeling like it had good midrange pull, but not massively quick (not compared to the M Roadster), but this feels a lot quicker than my 182, and not far off the MR.
Even after having a mk1 before, its going to take a while to get used to the whuurs and clunks that the V6 makes in almost every situation. Its ok, I've been told that's what they're supposed to do....
Similar threads
