and how exactly is a 182 old school. lol and it also depends on your opinion of progress. the only progress renault made with the 200 was quality or so were told. how long do those recaros last before there down to the plastic inside. lol
i dont expect car manufacturers to make anything for me personally either, unlike a lot of folk on here i have a brain and can decide not to buy there cars if i dont like them not just because its the latest thing.
and yeah im 12 roy, ill just have to wait a few decades to be 50 like you and aspire to drive a volvo engined ford ; ).
Compared to the 172s I've had, the 197/200 is substantially more stable, and can be driven faster through fast corners. This is my observation after 300+ 'Ring laps.
My friend who works in a shop that prepares classic race cars, sat with me for 10 laps and then drove a standard 200 Cup at the trackday the next day, and noted how the 200 Cup, although no faster in a straight line, manages to have a lot less body roll than my car (which is on KW V2s and has the rear anti roll bar), and manages to take bumps even better. The greater stability of the 3rd generation Clio RS was also something noted by one of the test drivers of the R35 GTR.
Translated into laptimes the improvements of the 197/200 over the 172/182 yield roughly 10~15s over a full lap.
Some improvements aren't obvious at first.
This also brings me to another point, why has no one offered a thicker front anti roll bar for the 172/182?