Is yours also a shed? lolCocamainy said:wow, I thought I was the only one with a Mk1 ph3 1.2 sorry off topit
john.med said:I had a 1.2 16v cliosport...
what's one of them then?
john.med said:I had a 1.2 16v cliosport...
what's one of them then?
crazycup said:its a 1.2 16v Clio Sport ... Y reg, black, sports seats, 14" alloys . Old shape ..... if you know anything about clios you will know what one is.
fUbAr said:ignore john ^^ ... he's never got anything useful to say.
i know the exact car your talking about
fUbAr said:ignore john ^^ ... he's never got anything useful to say.
i know the exact car your talking about
john.med said:If you ask a question you look foolish for a moment, if you don't you're foolish forever.
What's your prob Fubar and crazy',.. So I've only had a Clio for a year, previously driving mostly German cars... Shoot me now
Ryan said:Right I own a Mk1 1.2 so I dont know what its like to go fast lol!
But what I want to know is what makes people think Clio's are great the the twisties? Is there any proof or is it just coz people say so?
john.med said:no worries fella, really never heard of one before. I've only had this car and an old R5 a few years back, that were renaults...
You having a bad day Fubar,.. Or ''ave we got beef''?
bill said:yes, thats exactley what makes them so great, i used to have a clio 16v with well set up suspension and NOTHING, and i mean NOTHING ever touched it on the twisties, took it round silverstone ( trax 2000 ) i think, and nothing but a integra type r got close to me, and it was only a matter of time till he moved over, i now have a williams with standard suspension, its not quite up to scratch with the 16v i had, but nothings touched it yet, once its got a good set of coilovers on it, IT WILL BE INVINCIBLE HA HA ! :EVIL:
Ryan said:I know I dont need 2 worry about them, hench the I own a 1.2 so dont know what its like to go fast!
I was just wondering why people say 172/182's are good in the twisties?
3. Good, but not too excessive levels of grip; important - too many cars are over-tyred and have too much grip - users will push em too hard and find the limits rather suddenly and with dramatic consquences.
There are plenty of other hatches out there that are great handlers, a standard 1.2 Clio drives well but isn't a patch on the RS Clios. But with a bit of tweaking they should handle almost as well, just will lack the power!!
What do you mean you dont know what its like to go fast in a mk1 ph3? Ive got exactly the same BIARRITZ model and its really quick and nippy. Appart from after getting to 70+ the steering wheel shakes, its really happy going quickly.
There are plenty of other hatches out there that are great handlers, a standard 1.2 Clio drives well but isn't a patch on the RS Clios. But with a bit of tweaking they should handle almost as well, just will lack the power!!
with a bit of tweaking they will handle better than a standard RenaultSport clio, everyone always says they should handle nearly as good as a 172/182 as if its a totally different car when in reality its not!
stick some better dampers, springs and tyres on a 1.2, 1.4 or 1.6 and it will handle better than a standard RS clio. as nearly everyone on here who has owned a well set up non RS, who now owns a 172/182 will tell you.
5. Entertaining chassis - that "X-factor" that few cars have, and is perhaps unintentional by the manufacturer, but what makes the car feel "fun".
5. Entertaining chassis - that "X-factor" that few cars have, and is perhaps unintentional by the manufacturer, but what makes the car feel "fun".
^^^Think thats where Renault have really excelled. I don't think its unintentional - they done it before with the Williams. Its surprising how many other manufacturers cannot deliver in this department.
It might handle better, but if you havent got the power to go with it, you aint gonna be keeping up... not to mention, an RS owner doesnt have to spend extra on the car to make it handle, it already does