My 172 had 17s on it when i bought it. My arch liners are ripped to pieces and that was on standard springs.
Mot to mention they look f**king stupid on 17s
No brakes :rasp:Before i fitted the new pepper pots, i had 17 inch BSA alloys fitted![]()
![]()
17s look fine, fill the arches
15s or smaller look like your driving on Jaffacakes
Even if lowered looks far to small..
sick bro
![]()
im behaving now. no more spam
sick bro
![]()
im behaving now. no more spam
sick bro
![]()
im behaving now. no more spam
My 17s are hardly any bigger with 205 40s
than standard 16s with 195 45s i think they are
just a bit wider...
Less tyre more rim no probs atall
my old 1.2 was on apex 60mm springs
![]()
Looks and handled terrible on 17s tho. Its all about the 15s![]()
I thought thats how it worked but i was told the 2
Measurements were in relation to each other so 205 40 sidewals
arnt the same hight as 195 40 sidwalls and 205 40s arnt the
same width as 205 45s i could be wrong but im sure i was told
That..
But yea if i sat my standard wheels next to my 17s theres noyhing init .