Its not up for Police to decide who is at fault in this case. The only Officer's who could say who was at fault would be specifically trained accident investigation teams and I dont want to shatter any illusions but IMHO there is not a snowballs chance in hell they would've turned out for this. Besides which the vehicles have now been moved to wherever.
It would be a huge waste of public money for the Police to turn out to every fender bender to decide who was at fault dont you think? At most if the Police had been called to this incident the driver's would've been supervised in swapping documents, HORT/1 forms issued and a brief account taken. Put on a form and submitted. End of as far as the local cop is concerned.
EVERY single accident fault is at dispute. In 5 years of driving I have had 5 accidents all of which were no fault claims. Why do you think in the insurance paperwork it says "Never admit liability".
And also from reading what theu guy had to say - he crossed oncoming traffic. Thats as cut and dried to the solictior as him rear ending someone - its just not viable to fight that sort of case.
With all due respect I appreicate that you have had some input on accidents and you have a friend in Traffic so no disrespect to him, but its not up for Police to debate fault in this case. Nor form an opinion on it.
