and these make the 182 better than the 172 because ?!!?????!!!Quote: Originally posted by Loony on 20 August 2005
IMO its worth having the 182 over the 172 (ive owned both)
it cant be changed to 182 spec for sensible money so i wouldnt bother.
differences are exhaust system, wheels, tyres (182 runs 205s instead of 195s) suspension, gear ratios, headlamps have grey instead of black surrounds, seatbelts are silver not black, interior dash trims are satin silver rather than patterned silver, seats have silver lining behind the perforations in the alcantara rather than charcoal colour, all 182s have cruise, esp and traction whereas some 172s dont (maily pre53 platers) erm all i can remember at the mo but bound to be more ive forgotten.
welcome by the way, sad that in your first post you feel the need to tell people not to shoot you down in flames but I can see why you had to.Quote: Originally posted by len_beach on 20 August 2005
Dont shoot me down as I am new to this Clio lark. Ive had a good search but cant find the answer.
Quote: Originally posted by Adamf on 21 August 2005
Renaults seem to go wrong left right and centre!
Quote: Originally posted by rory182 on 21 August 2005
welcome by the way, sad that in your first post you feel the need to tell people not to shoot you down in flames but I can see why you had to.
This was not meant to signify that I thought this forum would get arsey. Its just that I am a member of quite a few other forums (Migweb, SeatCupra.net etc). As soon as a new member pops up with what appears to be a well covered topic, they are directed towards the search button. Not very helpful I know.
Id like to say thanks for all the quick responses my question.
I take it from peoples reactions that the electronic gizmos on the 182 dont make it a better car than the 172?
What does it take to get the engine up to 182 spec?
sorry loony i was hammeredQuote: Originally posted by Loony on 21 August 2005
Topic: Differences between mk2 172 and 182???
answering his question. I i didnt say those were the differences that made it a better car/drive they are merely a list of changes.
Elaborate on this 192 figure my friend. What is involved and how much?Quote: Originally posted by Clarkie172 on 21 August 2005
get a 172 and make it a 192 for less than buying a 182
Quote: Originally posted by len_beach on 22 August 2005
So 172-182:
Twin outlet exhaust that removes the spare wheel-A bit gay really. I think it looks cool, but then again it depends if ur a bit gay or not lol...
Widened front and rear tracks-This effect can be achieved with new alloys with a different offset. Aye I think so? Ive got 182 wheels on my 172.. dont know much about this thou am no expert on it.
Revised front suspension/re-rated suspension/strengthened rear suspension-A decent spring/damper setup can give the same if not better performance? Eibach springs dont lower the car by much and are apparently really good. Or you could get coilovers!
Wider, new generation tyres-New alloys again? The profiles on the new 182s are 205/45/16 unlike 195/45/16 on the 172, so an extra 10mm of tread! The Michelin PE2s were also developed specifically for the 182 with Cup packs/182 Cup/Trophy. Stiffer sidewall, they grip well too, I have em :O)
24mm anti-roll bar-This sounds like a good off the shelf mod. Any info? f**k knows.
3y exhaust manifold-Again, another good off the shelf mod. 182 manifold is better than the 172 one, but you can still fit the 182 manifold onto the 172. Think the 182 manifold is a 4-2-1 and the 172 manifold is just 4-1...
So if I was realistically looking for a circa 200bhp 172 with a 30-40mm drop on 16/17s without destroying the handling, what would I need? Ind.kit, exhaust, 182 manifold, inlet work, remap, not sure what else. Cams at a last guess, or throttle bodies .. Coilovers or eibach springs for the suspension.
Slightly off topic, I would just like to say how impressed I am with the nature of this forum. Members are forthcoming with info and specs. I have not been shot down as I put it earlier for covering old ground and there seems to be a wealth of knowledge in here. Were all just really sad and have nothing better to do with our lives, but thanks :O)
Top marks.
Quote: Originally posted by StevieP on 22 August 2005
Quote: Originally posted by len_beach on 22 August 2005
So 172-182:
Twin outlet exhaust that removes the spare wheel-A bit gay really. I think it looks cool, but then again it depends if ur a bit gay or not lol...
Widened front and rear tracks-This effect can be achieved with new alloys with a different offset. Aye I think so? Ive got 182 wheels on my 172.. dont know much about this thou am no expert on it.
The 182s track is widened by the suspension NOT the wheels, the 182 wheels are actually a higher offset (ie spacer further in) than 172 wheels. If you want to widen the track on a 172 fit cup alloys, fitting 182 wheels to a 172 will actually make the track narrower.
Revised front suspension/re-rated suspension/strengthened rear suspension-A decent spring/damper setup can give the same if not better performance? Eibach springs dont lower the car by much and are apparently really good. Or you could get coilovers!
Id personally opt for a set of H&R coilovers if you are looking to improve the 172.
Wider, new generation tyres-New alloys again? The profiles on the new 182s are 205/45/16 unlike 195/45/16 on the 172, so an extra 10mm of tread! The Michelin PE2s were also developed specifically for the 182 with Cup packs/182 Cup/Trophy. Stiffer sidewall, they grip well too, I have em :O)
24mm anti-roll bar-This sounds like a good off the shelf mod. Any info? f**k knows.
I would say youd probably need the 182 rollbar and mounting rubbers/brackets to upgrade to this but without comparing the two on Renaults parts disc its hard to say.
3y exhaust manifold-Again, another good off the shelf mod. 182 manifold is better than the 172 one, but you can still fit the 182 manifold onto the 172. Think the 182 manifold is a 4-2-1 and the 172 manifold is just 4-1...
yup but its a subframe/engine out job and IIRC about 6 hours to fit so not cheap once youve added the labour !
So if I was realistically looking for a circa 200bhp 172 with a 30-40mm drop on 16/17s without destroying the handling, what would I need? Ind.kit, exhaust, 182 manifold, inlet work, remap, not sure what else. Cams at a last guess, or throttle bodies .. Coilovers or eibach springs for the suspension.
Slightly off topic, I would just like to say how impressed I am with the nature of this forum. Members are forthcoming with info and specs. I have not been shot down as I put it earlier for covering old ground and there seems to be a wealth of knowledge in here. Were all just really sad and have nothing better to do with our lives, but thanks :O)
Top marks.
Quote: Originally posted by meggerman on 22 August 2005
the 172 is built better than the 182 with more expensive parts that they took out for money saving or they just ran out and used some 1.2 trim.
Dont agree trim wise its improved, the door plastics are far better ive never had any trim problems. Mechanically id say nothings changed you either get a good one or a bad one. Once warranty has replaced everything, your laughing!
imo the seats are worse, the carbon finish isnt as good, the handbreak doesnt have the metal bit, and in general i think the 182 was just made to boost flagging sales until the new model arrives.
What? theres no carbon finish? and the handbrake does have the metal bit! This boost sales stuff is spot but the way people make it sound is like its some bargian basement clear out. The clio has only just now reached the end of its cycle. The 182 was launched a year ago so its hardly a clearance item. You could refer to the 172mk2 or any new edition as a sales booster. Alot of development money was spent on new parts.
however its faster and handles better. but the exhaust look silly and there is no spare wheel. in fact you can make your 1110 172 1090 like the 182 by removing the spare wheel and kit i weighed it at approx 20kgs.
Have to agree there, the std exhausts look rubbish.
Quote: Originally posted by Loony on 22 August 2005
Quote: Originally posted by StevieP on 22 August 2005
Quote: Originally posted by len_beach on 22 August 2005
Widened front and rear tracks-This effect can be achieved with new alloys with a different offset. Aye I think so? Ive got 182 wheels on my 172.. dont know much about this thou am no expert on it.
The 182s track is widened by the suspension NOT the wheels, the 182 wheels are actually a higher offset (ie spacer further in) than 172 wheels. If you want to widen the track on a 172 fit cup alloys, fitting 182 wheels to a 172 will actually make the track narrower.
so by putting 182 cup wheels on my 172 ive made my track narrower?.... Balls... Should it be noticable?
Quote: Originally posted by Loony on 22 August 2005
Ive owned both a phase 2 172 and a 182, you know which i prefer ? yup the 182
Same here and agree with that comment