Great Showing from the Renaultsport boys
61 = 200 Cup
55 = Alpine A610
30 = Williams
25 = V6 255
7 = Clio Trophy
5 = R26.R
There must be a printing error - there is no 197?!?
Great Showing from the Renaultsport boys
61 = 200 Cup
55 = Alpine A610
30 = Williams
25 = V6 255
7 = Clio Trophy
5 = R26.R
evo is a great mag, harry metcalf must know his stuff as three of his cars made it to the top ten
Standard build quality mate, you know that.Not being picky... (well, clearly i am)
But that front end has been shunted! Headlights/bonnet/grill out of line and missing black stickers....
Battered press car??
There must be a printing error - there is no 197?!?
Hmm but in car of the decade they placed the ferrari 550 ahead of the zonda
no M3 CSL, M3 sport evo, honda integra type R or NSX-R??
Not being picky... (well, clearly i am)
But that front end has been shunted! Headlights/bonnet/grill out of line and missing black stickers....
Yeah, if you look at the small grill part above the reg plate & follow it along, there should be a small black sticker at either end of that part.Black stickers? Que
Is there plenty of pics of the 200 in it?
evo is a great mag, harry metcalf must know his stuff as three of his cars made it to the top ten
Now, I have never driven 99.9% of the cars featured in this top 100 (and I know that at the end of the day it's just the opinion of journalists, albit highly respected one's in this case) but placing a 2.0 Litre Trophy ahead of a 4.3 Litre 560 bhp V8 Ferrari 430 Scuderia in a drivers car list is questionable. That Ferrari, while probably a bugger in traffic, is comedy, sex and violence incarnate. The Trophy is a great car, but come on... better than a 120K track Fezza?
I can't wait to read next month's letters page.
This point always gets raised. If you take them as overall cars, of course the 430's the better car. But in terms of purely driving the door handles off the thing, why couldn't the Clio be better? Or any light, small car with decent engineering behind it? On those grounds, they might as well have just listed the cars in terms of value!
All the things that make the 430 etc so special, also conspire to make them pretty unuseable on a daily basis. And the fact that they are pretty intimidating also means that the majority of owners will never push the car's limits in anything but a straight line. Whereas a cheap, light car, you have no qualms about jumping in and driving the doors off it. With the added bonus that if you do get pulled over, it's likely to be a chat rather than a custodial sentence lol.
I totally understand what you're saying, but on a narrow, twisty road, there isn't much that can keep up with a well driven Trophy. They're absolutely brilliant little cars, and it just goes to show that you don't have to spend a fortune to enjoy the thrill of driving that evo magazine claims to be all about. Yes, you'd have the Scuderia every single time, but the Trophy is an affordable hero, in reach of everyone, the Scuderia is £150k+. Oh, and it has 503bhp, not 560!
True. True. Totally agree on the affordability side. I was going to say that surely a 430 Scud would blitz a Trophy, even through the twisties, but we're heading into pointless argument territory.
I think the Porche faithful will probably have a few thinsg to say about this list. They always feel hard done by if awarded anything less than top spot.
But feel, feedback, enjoyment are what makes a road car great(which is where these cars were tested). I'd argue that excess speed means you can utilise them even less. You can go absolutely banana's in a Trophy on our roads, you just can't do that in a new M3, let alone a supercar.I kind of agree with what is being said here but given that a 2.5 ton porsche cayene can lap bedford quicker than a trophy,its still a great car but not brilliant
Exactly. A s1 Elise is noisey as f**k, but epic to drive. And F40 will feel like a kit car compared to a 430, but I know which I'd rather have. All the plush refinements that people seem to get excited over add weight. Weight kills performance, dulls responses and harms handling.
But feel, feedback, enjoyment are what makes a road car great(which is where these cars were tested). I'd argue that excess speed means you can utilise them even less. You can go absolutely banana's in a Trophy on our roads, you just can't do that in a new M3, let alone a supercar.
I agree on this. On a minute scale, I even enjoy my Ignis Sport more than I did my 172 Cup. The fact that it's slower but pretty much as chuckable means that I get to play around more, it feels fast at 60mph, which is exactly what I want in a car. Sport Ka, Panda 100hp, MX-5, Trophy etc are loved by journalists who get to drive pretty much everything going, that speaks volumes, imo.
I've never driven a supercar in anger on the road, but after the initial thrill and event of driving such a car, I'm willing to bet that day to day it would be quite a frustrating experience. At least I/we can drive the nuts off of our cars pretty much all the time. Finding the limit in an F430 on a public road in the UK probably doesn't occur too often.