Second game was excellent if you stuck to the ain story/quests.
FarCry = awesome apart from the last level being a bit of a chore.
FarCry 2 = awesome if you followed the main story and not the rather tiresome side quests.
FarCry 3 = fully awesome.
Was there even a story line to it, wake up in village with malaria. begin running missions which have no point what so ever, All I ever did was run about from one side of the map to the other, stop in the desert to set fire to some zebra, then carry on. I worry FC3 will be the same. Despite its excellent character animation and graphics, I think there's some real potential for FC3 to be a load of f**king s**t if they haven't learned from the mistakes they made with the previous games.
You would know then?
(not having a dig)
Was there even a story line to it...
I ended up doing nothing but driving around aimlessly doing f**k all but shooting animals and getting bored
Far Cry 2 although very much open world was one of the most repetitive games I have ever played.
Then you weren't really playing it properly.
f**king hell! This looks mental!
yes, I know this is the PC version.
Probably best muting the video & skipping through..