Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
wow .. thats a mk2 172 with a 0-60 time in the 6.6 region .. that answers my question from the other day...to whether anyone had managed a sub 7 second 0-60.... well impressed... I thought i read a 0-100 time of 17.9 though, is 19 good ???
No question a CTR is faster to 100, 6 gears and all them revs, but figures Ive seen show its all after 80, up till the its the same.
Autocar timed a 172, 24 secs to 100, and I cant believe they wernt trying. They tested run in ones at 17.9 (LHD Mk1), 19.08 (RHD Mk1) I have the issues of Autocar in front of me. So plenty of variation, what would a run in CTR do ?
However in ther article where they say the 172 makes the V6 look clueless under braking they lie twice. They say the reaction time in the 172 was longer, the figures show it shorter, they say the overall braking time 100-0 was 3 tenths less in the 172, the figures show it was three hundredths less, they are so full of sh*t.