The fuse is lit.
Cups are raaaaaaaappid!!
wasnt their 0-60 reported to be as low as 5 secs if u got a good one?
Aye...172 cup.. mission statement..
'dusting off super cars since 2002'
ps cups are for the poor
182 v 172 cup + 1/4 mile + bundle of cash at the finish = cup man not so poor anymore
its not about the ride . . .
its the rider! (tokyo drift) lol
So i take it from what your saying i can conclude that the entire 172/82 range are pretty similar in performance except the cup and trophy but theres an army of young, uneducated individuals on here that firmly believe their car is the creation of god himself and nothing can defeat it in the clash of the titans at their local set of traffic lights?
suzi?Pigs also flew last week Daniel..x
Pigs also flew last week Daniel..x
The fuse is lit.
Aye, flew right past a 197 that EVO said 6.9 is the time that it takes to tickle 60 lol
Just messing mate, all figures should be taken with a pinch of salt as no two are built the same
Aye, flew right past a 197 that EVO said 6.9 is the time that it takes to tickle 60 lol
Just messing mate, all figures should be taken with a pinch of salt as no two are built the same
172 owners - rich softies that are jealous that their car is slower than the Cup and try to make out they needed aircon in order to justify their lack of speed and handling.
Cup owners - poor, hard ba$tards who live life on the edge and take it the limit every day.
But really, very little difference in performance in road driving. However, The Cup is a track hero and that's where you would see an advantage in the weight saving etc.