172
Morning all,
Since buying my 172 I have been looking at lods of old car reviews on good old you tube. I see that the renaultsport clio's always seem to get pitted against the civic type r and the toyota corolla.
Now is it just me or is it a little unfair to be comparing the 172/182 clio's to these cars as both these cars seem to have a lot more horsepower and seem to be more refined all round. I know you have to take into account power to weight ratio as well but any idiot could work out that a type r and even the corolla with nearly 20/30 bhp more as standard will eventually have the legs on a 172/182.
Or is it credit to renault that the clio 172/182's were compared to such brilliant cars and were able to compete to a degree???
Since buying my 172 I have been looking at lods of old car reviews on good old you tube. I see that the renaultsport clio's always seem to get pitted against the civic type r and the toyota corolla.
Now is it just me or is it a little unfair to be comparing the 172/182 clio's to these cars as both these cars seem to have a lot more horsepower and seem to be more refined all round. I know you have to take into account power to weight ratio as well but any idiot could work out that a type r and even the corolla with nearly 20/30 bhp more as standard will eventually have the legs on a 172/182.
Or is it credit to renault that the clio 172/182's were compared to such brilliant cars and were able to compete to a degree???