elllo mate i know how you feel tbh i bought a 172 last july and have had 4 new engines since then and ive only just got it mint
best thing to do is go on that ebay link above and order the bits you need because there piss cheap on there and get your mechnic to fit it.
but first of all id run it to a renault specialist like ktec/rentech/gdi/yozzasport get them to check it all out first before doing anything these renaults are quite tappy and if its running good a pulling like a train i dont see how the head and cams etc are f**ked tbh
If he has the original advert in which it states that the car only had 40,000 (or how ever many miles it was) he does have a leg to stand on.
It will be the sellers responsibility to prove that his advert was valid. If its legit then he should just be able to show that things like...
MOT certificates match back to the mileage.
Engine No. matches the V5 etc
I'm not trying to annoy anyone. I'm currently training to be a management accountant and work in a legal & accounting firm so I'm only trying to help.
FLOL!!
Ever heard the expression innocent until proven guilty???
the guy doesn't have to do jack. it's down to you to prove he's lying.
thats like saying in a murder trial the accused has to prove he didnt do it when he reality the prosecution have to prove he did.
but as has been said, sold as seen, the OP has no leg to stand on.
if he wasn't happy with it he shouldnt have bought it. end of.
you may work\now people from a lawform but you clearly know didly squat.
i'm feel sorry for the OP, lesson learnt and all that.
LMAO learn to read! As from the AA webiste you've just quoted
Exactly my point ....LESS COMEBACK .... not NO COMEBACK as you we're stating.
'Invitation to Treat' means that by entering the shop you are offering to buy the goods and so no contract exists until the shop expresses acceptance.
FLOL!!
Ever heard the expression innocent until proven guilty???
the guy doesn't have to do jack. it's down to you to prove he's lying.
thats like saying in a murder trial the accused has to prove he didnt do it when he reality the prosecution have to prove he did.
but as has been said, sold as seen, the OP has no leg to stand on.
if he wasn't happy with it he shouldnt have bought it. end of.
you may work\now people from a lawform but you clearly know didly squat.
i'm feel sorry for the OP, lesson learnt and all that.
lol is that the best you can come up with.
I expect you're the type that thinks that if you walk into a shop and they have priced something wrong you can demand to have it at that price ..... its also total b*** ****!
No sorry, you must be confusing me with someone else.
Offer + Acceptance = legally binding contract
'Invitation to Treat' means that by entering the shop you are offering to buy the goods and so no contract exists until the shop expresses acceptance.
The reason people think the opposite is because generally a gesture of goodwill is far easier than a public confrontation.
You're the mug mate .... typical keyboard warrior defending something YOU clearly know nothing about.
ok, i'm a keyboard warrior. you got me.
The simple fact is the vehicle wasn't as described!! (can you understand that simple statement?)
If the advert clearly states the mileage as being 44k and the engine has done nearer 100k it will be blatantly obvious with a simple inspection and so easy to prove.
just out of sheer curiosity and seeing as you seem to know everything and i know nothing, what if the previous owner had no idea of any of this? what happens then?
http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index...les.htm#Thevehiclewasboughtfromaprivateseller
The CAB website clearly says the same... go and tell them they're wrong :rasp:
Its not like we're talking a £200 banger its £5.5k.
Its people like you that get ripped off day in day out and always take the lazy and easy route.
dan.clio.
Lol whilst you appear to have a comprehensive knowledge of consumer rights etc
As I said previously how do you prove that the seller knew the engine had been changed, where did the 100k come from? Its impossible to pinpoint exactly how many miles an engine has done even if you stripped it down which would be a very labour intensive process.
Exactly my point... LESS COMEBACK.. not NO COMEBACK as you were stating.
Its not about the buyer checking over the condition of the car.
If the car has been sold in good faith with a genuine 44k on the clock as advertised then no law has been broken. The vehicle was as described and it would just be a case of bad luck
However apparently this car was advertised as having 44k and the mechanic is saying its a different engine/ with nearly double the mileage.... a totally different scenario.
In a civil case like this im sure it's guilty till proven innocent if it was to go to court. And its your word against his.
you can apply to the DVLA to find out all the MOTs taken after the 3 years and the milage of the car.
In a civil case like this im sure it's guilty till proven innocent if it was to go to court. And its your word against his.
you just completely contradicted yourself there!
you say the seller has to prove he's innocent but then say its your word against his, which ultimately means nothing will come of it.
you cannot prove the seller new about the "supposed" clocked/swapped engine.
Wow. Another person chatting s**t.If the defendant has no defence he is presumed guilty, but if he does defend himself then its his word against yours and the judge decides in favour of who has the stronger arguement. Wheres the contradiction?
Wow. Another person chatting s**t.If the defendant has no defence he is presumed guilty, but if he does defend himself then its his word against yours and the judge decides in favour of who has the stronger arguement. Wheres the contradiction?
I think the squabbling actually comes from the people who fail to realise that not everything they see or hear (or google) is truethe squabbling seems to be coming from the less intelligent people who have to ridicule valid points because they don't possess the brain power to understand them...