ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

Just dont look right



  Monaco 172 (5/468)
as in the title.......... I fitted some budget lowering springs to my clio yesterday *well my dad did* and it just looks wierd to me, what do you guys think, put the standard ones back on i was thinking ? looks higher at the front. Please no wise cracks

DSC00171.JPG
 
  Burgandy 174 sport t
U got stuff in the boot? thats looks well low unless they really ae pish springs, apex? front looks ok to me
 
seems about right, had mine done over the weekend, and the front is higher than the back. Maybe the springs need time to settle.

FP02UFG_030.gif
 
  172 M69 eater
why don't you park it somewhere else and take a pic,,, the wheels are on different surfaces!
 
^^^ good point, and dan is right, let them settle and if they still dont look right then talk to
the supplier . . . . what mmm are they meant to be? back looks like 60 front looks like 40 atm

jamie
 

BREMBO

ClioSport Club Member
  V6 Mk1, Golf GTI Mk5
Front definetly looks high, maybe a splitter may make a slight diffrence :)
 
  Monaco 172 (5/468)
^^^ good point, and dan is right, let them settle and if they still dont look right then talk to
the supplier . . . . what mmm are they meant to be? back looks like 60 front looks like 40 atm

jamie


should be on 40's didnt want to go too low, heres it on a flatter road

DSC00188.JPG
 
  Monaco 172 (5/468)
something thats kinda got me thinking i've been given the wrong ones is the shape of the back springs before we put them on they wasn't the same shape as the ones what came off, unfortunatley i dint take any pictures.
The ones that we took off are straight but the new ones where like a oval shape would anyone know if this is correct. or anyone have any pictures of some new apex springs so i could compare ? before fitting of course

Thanks John
 
  Monaco 172 (5/468)
took my car to visit the people who sold me the springs today, The young bloke behind the counter came out to look at the car he said after looking " that aint right " after speaking to his supplier he needed a number from the spring to try and match it up with his database and to confirm that he'd supplied the correct one.

So off i went to jack the car up, while i was undernieth i took a photo of the spring ;) what you think ?

DSC00196.JPG
 
  BMW F31
look about right to me mate, thats what mine looked like iirc, defo aint -40mm drop though, looks like -60mm
 

Gaz_

ClioSport Club Member
  Extreme mode
nah they are not right, there is no travel at all imo, (too squashed together) need a stiffer spring
 
  C63 AMG, F430 & 172
the red ones will be Pi.......<---- really s**t.. (also looks like they have sent 40mm fronts and 60mm rear) the spring is coil bound so it will knock ur teeth out and shag the weak shocks

if i were you. i would want them chaging to apex 40mm kit.. much better than the Pi crap.!!
 

Boz

  Arctic 182
Eibach sportlines are the way to go imo, decent looking drop and good ride/handling. Pi are poor.
 
  Monaco 172 (5/468)
swapping for apex tomorrow, the supplier said they were 100% 40mm drop but the guy in the shop is changing them free of charge. cheeky b*****d supplier said he wont swap them if there damaged :p

BTW Jamex is the make
 
  1.6 focus zetec....
Jamex are a good make in my experience!!! But the ones on my mates corsa went like that but he was pleased lol!!

Kiza
 
  Megane 225 Cup
i recon that looks good.. they always look higher at the back after time.. let them settle.

edit.

just seen that pic - thats fucked!

And whoever bought the apex's - HERO! - I got the same.
 
  Monaco 172 (5/468)
update :

got the b******s to change them and got my cliosport sticker, a s**te week turned it to a good one

clio.jpg
 


Top