Looking at getting a 172 cup

[gav182]

I think the cup v ff arguement could go on forever , but seriously an average driver will never notice the very small difference in performance .

 

[gaz44]

I'll end it. Cup rules!

 

[p90ade]

get a ff 172 unless your going to take it on a track. nicer place to be on the inside


oh and by the way mines in the for sale section:rasp: :rasp:

 

[CabinFever]

I think the cup v ff arguement could go on forever , but seriously an average driver will never notice the very small difference in performance .

I beg to differ, anyone in the Essex area willing to put an end to this wee dabarcle feel free to bring your video camera!

 

[Gaz_]

pmsl!!!

 

[cliocup182]

i would bother getting a 172 there a cool car but since i got the 182 cup its alot more fun

 

[172cupwizard]

I'll end it. Cup rules!

Hell yeah!

 

[cK]

http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?t=203703

 

[team_penetrator]

Why is it that whenever anyones talking about Cups, certain people always wade in going on about how there variant is better blah blah blah.

Seems strange that, mentioning no names, its always the same people..

Lets face it, they are all good but all slightly different. Everyone makes their own choice, so whats all the fuss about??

172FF is a great car and is a much nicer place to be, with more toys and a nicer interior.

172Cup is very slightly quicker, is a little more responsive round corners, but isnt the best place to be with its low spec interior.

Personally, I liked the performance orientation of the Cup and wasnt bothered about the interior, so I went for a Cup..

 

[gilo]

after all that i'm actually trying to sell my cup soon. if you or anyones interested let me know on here or g1_lo8@hotmail.com:evil:

 

[Steve2004]

The 172 cup is 171 Bhp per tonne...fact, the mk 2 is ......... actually i dont care what it is

Fact? 170bhp into 1021kg doesn't equal 171!

172 FF ph2 = 153bhp per ton
172 Cup = 167 (rounded up) bhp per ton. On par with the 182 cup.

(Even if you use 172bhp for the cup, it's 168bhp per ton)


Still a fair difference between the two 172 ph2 variants though. Those FFs are so heavy!

 

[Ex-User (19928)]

You won't notice the difference on the road in a straight line.

10bhp per tonne is nothing.

 

[John D]

Why is it that whenever anyones talking about Cups, certain people always wade in going on about how there variant is better blah blah blah.

Seems strange that, mentioning no names, its always the same people..

Lets face it, they are all good but all slightly different. Everyone makes their own choice, so whats all the fuss about??

172FF is a great car and is a much nicer place to be, with more toys and a nicer interior.

172Cup is very slightly quicker, is a little more responsive round corners, but isnt the best place to be with its low spec interior.

Personally, I liked the performance orientation of the Cup and wasnt bothered about the interior, so I went for a Cup..

Wise words :approve: