Reading the spec' CLio is 172 PS and 210Nm whilst the ZR160 is 160PS and 174Nm, weight is similar, yet performance is much closer than I would have thought.
Clio172 0-62 7.2sec 138mph top
ZR160 0-62 7.4sec 131mph top
Rover develops max torque loewr in the rev range and max power at higher rev's.
Anyone driven a ZR or experienced what they're like? ZR boys reckon they're very close and on a track the ZR is slightly quicker as its wheel base and track width are both greater than the Clio. Not trying to start a daft "Well i raced a Porsche and beat it" chain, just gain some opinion from anyone who has actual experience of the two please.
Thanks,
Harvey
Clio172 0-62 7.2sec 138mph top
ZR160 0-62 7.4sec 131mph top
Rover develops max torque loewr in the rev range and max power at higher rev's.
Anyone driven a ZR or experienced what they're like? ZR boys reckon they're very close and on a track the ZR is slightly quicker as its wheel base and track width are both greater than the Clio. Not trying to start a daft "Well i raced a Porsche and beat it" chain, just gain some opinion from anyone who has actual experience of the two please.
Thanks,
Harvey