The k-tek brace is cleverly designed. At the ends of the brace are cup-shaped parts which slide over the top of the suspension turrets. They fit really snugly. So while the top bolts secure the brace its also the turrets that take the lateral forces.Quote: Originally posted by BenR on 02 June 2003
and a strut bar secured via the strut top bolts alone is a bit of a waste.
I received the new Magnex catalogue through the post last week with a note attached to say that the magnex range now officially fit the mk2 172.Quote: Originally posted by paddymph on 02 June 2003
that looks amazing! How easy was it re. the exhaust? Apparently a few places wont fit the oval magnex the the mk2, is it just a back box?
cheers
Dont be daft owly, anyone can see that it gives 25bhp and oodles more torque, also makes you more attractive to the opposite sexQuote: Originally posted by evilowl on 03 June 2003
I wonder - does the strutbrace make a noticeable difference in use though, and do you have a lower brace fitted as well?
Or is it just a shiny thing to attach your shopping bags to as hype posted
**chortle** I was told a simple Max Power sticker added 25BHP - sod the 100 odd quid for the strut braceQuote: Originally posted by telford_mike on 03 June 2003
Dont be daft owly, anyone can see that it gives 25bhp and oodles more torque, also makes you more attractive to the opposite sexQuote: Originally posted by evilowl on 03 June 2003
I wonder - does the strutbrace make a noticeable difference in use though, and do you have a lower brace fitted as well?
Or is it just a shiny thing to attach your shopping bags to as hype posted
Actually mine has made a difference to the back of the car, not sure what yet - need to get it on a track, but a Clio at the rear is just a big box, with nothing to secure the tops of the struts. Keeping the turrets a uniform distance apart has got to be a good thing.
But even better than that...... the rear of the car is now a rattle-free zone, even over big bumps.