03 Clio 1.6 16v Dynamique
Hey guys,
In almost every review I've read on the 172/182, the first negative point is usually always that they aren't very comfortable, or generally not very refined on motorways.
I really am unclear as to why. Even my 1.6 Dynamique sits at 80 very comfortably and has a lot of umph left in it after then, and I'll happily get 36-38 Mpg at those kind of speeds on a good day.
Is the main complaint that the 1*2's didnt have a 6 speed box?
The 197 has a 6 speed doesn't it?
Also, the fact that the 182 has Cruise control would surely boast a bit of comfort at high speed?
Grateful of any explanations to prove that this theory is bollarx
Thanks,
Pete.
In almost every review I've read on the 172/182, the first negative point is usually always that they aren't very comfortable, or generally not very refined on motorways.
I really am unclear as to why. Even my 1.6 Dynamique sits at 80 very comfortably and has a lot of umph left in it after then, and I'll happily get 36-38 Mpg at those kind of speeds on a good day.
Is the main complaint that the 1*2's didnt have a 6 speed box?
The 197 has a 6 speed doesn't it?
Also, the fact that the 182 has Cruise control would surely boast a bit of comfort at high speed?
Grateful of any explanations to prove that this theory is bollarx
Thanks,
Pete.