Evo 5 RS
I think we'd need Joe too if I'm honest, bless it
scrap it*
I think we'd need Joe too if I'm honest, bless it
Ive just turned 20 and had my RS at 19 but even now i wouldnt say ive ever pushed it round corners i think something could go wrong.
Yeah il admit ive probably broken the speed limits at times and ive nailed it down slip roads etc but if i thought there was a chance it could slip/spin/flip then i wouldn't put my foot down.
Until i do a track day or have some tution id rather not find the limits of the car on a public road.
Thats what i meant sorry. I didnt word it very well.
Because its not just your life your risking.
It is Ridiculous Dan I agree but if they can afford it at that age who' to stop them. If I could have drievn one at that age I would have no matter what my parents said.
I wouldn't have piloted mine into a field though.
Anyway, very nasty crash and i've also seen a cup that was rolled quite a few time and the owner got out alive.
If you seen where the roof was sitting you'd wonder how he did manage to get out. Unreal safety for a small car.
Ill say it again.
A cars speed is governed by the driver, not the car.
He could have been driving a 1.2 at 100mph & crashed.
Agreed, I would have had an accident driving a 2.0 litre aswell.I agree with Dan.
I also think that until you have x amounts of driving years under your belt you should be limited to say a 1.4 maximum for your first few years.
Ill say it again.
A cars speed is governed by the driver, not the car.
He could have been driving a 1.2 at 100mph & crashed.
I think it all depends on your attitude as to whether or not you can drive a powerful car at a young age. Its not inexperience that caused this crash its stupidity.
Yep I agree... this is essentially what I was trying to say when i said this:
I think it all depends on your attitude as to whether or not you can drive a powerful car at a young age. Its not inexperience that caused this crash its stupidity.
He proabably wouldnt be able to hit 100mph in a 1.2
Reason for all this I blame solely on the lack of teaching proper driving and all these "5 day" car test bulls**t. The days of "learning to drive" have gone and been replaced with getting you to pass the test. My old man is a driving instructor and he see's pupils that have been on these courses..failed (and wasted £600-£700)..then come to him for lessons and can't even reverse around a corner or park.
lol...... 100 can be reached in pretty much any car nowadays. even back 20 years ago the minis/festas/scorts were capable of hitting over 100.
i love thos place tbh, slating the guy for doing the exact same thing you would all do given the chance. and i dont mean the running outta talent and crashing bit. if you all keep to the speed limits like you profess, why do you own a hot hatch? im pretty sure all the ppl slaggong him off have exceeded the speed limit. time for yous to get down off the soap box methinks
Get out!
Do you know how long it takes to hit 100mph in someones first car. Ie a 1.0 corsa?
You would need a stretch of road that's all i'm saying.
Get out!
Do you know how long it takes to hit 100mph in someones first car. Ie a 1.0 corsa?
You would need a stretch of road that's all i'm saying.
*2 cars start off down a country lane...one a 2.0 the other a 1.0. I bet you the 2.0 would hit 110mph before the other. Say the 2.0L car crashes at a tight right hander 800 yard..There is no way the 1.0 would be doing the same speed at the same corner thus "maybe" not having an accident at the same corner.
lol...... 100 can be reached in pretty much any car nowadays. even back 20 years ago the minis/festas/scorts were capable of hitting over 100.
i love thos place tbh, slating the guy for doing the exact same thing you would all do given the chance. and i dont mean the running outta talent and crashing bit. if you all keep to the speed limits like you profess, why do you own a hot hatch? im pretty sure all the ppl slaggong him off have exceeded the speed limit. time for yous to get down off the soap box methinks
Ah yes, but the 2.0 Trophy would probably go round the corner at 110.
The 1.2 corsa wouldnt.
Imho a quick car, designed for speed, is possibly safer for a youngster than a slow car, not designed for speed. Purely as it'll mask the mistakes better & help you out a bit more in a tricky situation.
An Evo 8, limited to 80mph for example, would be an epic 1st car - completely idiot proof lol.
I got my 182 at 19 but didn't crash it into a bush.
Saying that I also didn't go doing 110mph down a country lane; nor did I pay 4k for tpft insurance flol
*2 cars start off down a country lane...one a 2.0 the other a 1.0. I bet you the 2.0 would hit 110mph before the other. Say the 2.0L car crashes at a tight right hander 800 yard..There is no way the 1.0 would be doing the same speed at the same corner thus "maybe" not having an accident at the same corner.
Reason for that "driver Attitude"...Yeah ok!
*(all hypothetically speaking of course just an example!)
lol. hypothetically speaking.... 2.0 lardass volvo, 1.0 reliant kitten with with bike engine. your examples just been blown out the water
For me though, thats the problem, to get to decent speed in a 1.0 you need to keep your foot in for a long time!! Drive flat out constantly, etc. In a quick car you just toe it, get to desired speed, slow down again, etc.
Well yeah, a brand new £12k car is a bit different to a 10 year old £400 one.
Now your just being silly.
Okay il re-phrase seeing as your obviously such a pedantic tit Il even use the car seen in the OP.
2 "Standard" cars A clio Trophy and a Saxo start off down a country lane.........