L L1oyd V Jun 3, 2005 #1 Clio 1.6 16vs.... how quick are these puppies compared to the 172/182... seeing as its the next engine down?
Clio 1.6 16vs.... how quick are these puppies compared to the 172/182... seeing as its the next engine down?
B Ben H Jun 3, 2005 #3 110bhp, 9.5 secs to 60 and probably about high 20s/early 30s secs to 100. Warm rather than hot - probably quick enough to keep up with most 2.0 litre cars in the class above.
110bhp, 9.5 secs to 60 and probably about high 20s/early 30s secs to 100. Warm rather than hot - probably quick enough to keep up with most 2.0 litre cars in the class above.
Chris1.4RT Car ex Clio 172 owner :( Jun 3, 2005 #4 Ive convincingly beaten a 1.6 dynamique and I can more than keep up with a 172 in my little 1.6 16v God bless the vts. Ben? Keep up with isnt keeping in sight, its pretty much behind right in behind the car but not quite enough to get past. [Edited by Chris1.4RT on 03 June 2005 at 12:36pm]
Ive convincingly beaten a 1.6 dynamique and I can more than keep up with a 172 in my little 1.6 16v God bless the vts. Ben? Keep up with isnt keeping in sight, its pretty much behind right in behind the car but not quite enough to get past. [Edited by Chris1.4RT on 03 June 2005 at 12:36pm]