I'm actually looking at PH1's, and as they're getting on a bit there's a fair few at high miles but bodywork wise.. they're mint. I suppose it's probably cheaper to get a lower mileage engine and drop it in than refurb.
inho if you plan on keeping the car a while you'll be better off getting a engine rebuild as then essentially its all new internally, i know that's what il be doing with the cup rather than throwing a 2nd hand lump in with already worn rings etc etc, all depends how much you want 2 spend
Id say for something I would consider a "new" engine now, you would be looking at 4K spend or so really including labour, as you cant class it as new if its got old valves in it still when they fail so easily, likewise lifters wear out, oil pump, all new bearings, new pistons and a rebore etc. Its a lot of money to spend on a 1K car!
Mines up at them kind of miles Chip, still takes a boot full with out a flicker etc, thinking of getting mine refreshed i.e rings,shells,oil jets,bearings,honed, new oil pump etc and get the head rebuilt with new guides,valve springs,1 piece valves maybe abit head work etc
Depends what is required in terms of just fixing one that is worn out, and what standard you want it done to, personally I view new rings as only a freshen up to buy a bit more time, a proper rebuild should have new pistons and a rebore, all new lifters etc, and basically would run you into quite a few thousand.
These engines REALLY cope well with miles though, far more than most other engines, so dont do it "just because"
I put new rings in my mrs old daily 172 @ 140K, and TBH they werent really needed even then, it was just cause I had the head off anyway and happened to have a set on the shelf it kind of seemed silly not to do so.
Thats a load of rubbish you dont need to spend 4k why rebore an engine if it aint needed thats stupid a proper hone (not flexi hone) and a new set of rings will outlast the car
Also new valves? Seriously if they are straight then you reface the valve grind the seat and its like new there is nothing wrong with reusing pistons snd valves it woukd be stupid replacing if there is nothing wrong with them
Like I said for a recon engine your looking around the £1000 mark depending on what engine you have
if it's over tolerance it needs a bore and over sized pistons not a hone!Its a proper rebuild mate it wont make them lose in the bore if its over tolerance then it needs a hone. Simple stuff
Not gonna argue online about it my dads been doing it since he was 16 now 45 and we have had our family buisness over 20 years now rebuilding engines so im gonns go with what I no and do for a living
No but I cant be bothered writing out a massive list of bits it had for you to just argue cos you no best
was bored of you about 3 months ago
So the m3 engine that dropped a valve got just the Head (new valves or secondhand whole head with more old valves?) and piston in that cylinder replaced?
That is not a properly rebuilt engine to be as new, that's just a repair and quick freshen up.
Bored of you now tbh. Ask your dad to explain the difference as hopefully he should actually know enough what he is talking about to explain to you what a PROPER rebuild involves!
Crate engine if you can find one for sensible money is an option so long as it's not too old stock or the rubber bits all perish.
No but I cant be bothered writing out a massive list of bits it had for you to just argue cos you no best
was bored of you about 3 months ago
I put new rings in my mrs old daily 172 @ 140K, and TBH they werent really needed even then, it was just cause I had the head off anyway and happened to have a set on the shelf it kind of seemed silly not to do so.
Did you need to gap the rings? or are the stock Renault ones already pre-gapped ready to fit straight up?