Realistic as in i had a standard 1.8 Clio 16v - no mods apart from magnex cat back system and i made "138.2 bhp" i was happy with that.Quote: Originally posted by dogmaul on 17 November 2003
realistic or did they just show you what you wanted to see lol
Sounds about right as a wheel figure for a properly running 172.Quote: Originally posted by Wez172 on 17 November 2003
i have the print ou t if anyone can upload it.
i got 144 at the wheels
That would be approx 169bhp @ fly according to my maths, so perfect for a standard 172Quote: Originally posted by Wez172 on 17 November 2003
i got 144 at the wheels
As long as youre happy...Quote: Originally posted by Wez172 on 17 November 2003
well it say 173.2 on the print out and they say its a good clio so i will stick to that thanks.
Be interested to see that!Quote: Originally posted by Wez172 on 17 November 2003
You will see the print in a little while
I reckon were going to see some all over the place torque readings this weekend at the Bury RR day. Every RR day Ive been to there have been 172s with odd/bad torque curves. Isnt this the reason that the RSport/GrpN ECU works so well, as it somehow smooths the delivery of the torque?Quote: Originally posted by Rich-D on 17 November 2003
Why is the torque curve always all over the place?!![]()