RS Tunner mapping or Superchips ?

[bryera]

Hay guys I looking at geting a Clio 200 cup and the first thing I am doing is remapping it but I have also read a littel bit about Superchips and currently have a RS Tunner and was just going to buy a map of hank but what do people think is better for power and MPG and so on ?

 

[bryera]

That's the superchip that I been reading up on any one know if any good ?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsKIMZeqyOk&feature=related

 

[Chi]

RS TUNER for all things Renault

 

[RichyMa]

RS Tuner!

 

[Martin_172]

RS Tuner, no question about it!

 

[imprezaworks]

As above.

 

[MartinR]

Rstuner for mk2

Live mapping for mk3 imo.

 

[bryera]

Sorry what's this live mapping not heard of that ?

 

[imprezaworks]

Rolling road at a guess

 

[MartinR]

yep on a rolling road, such a better way of adjusting the map @chipmk1 Dan@SJM may explain the benefits of a live map against a pre wrote one

 

[imprezaworks]

I'm guessing because every car is different. Rolling road would get the optimum performance from the engine.

 

[Dan@SJM]

I use road mapping for mine.

But yes it's a much more accurate way of doing it, as your tuning it for YOUR car and OUR climate. As we well know each of these engines isn't the same as the next one. A generic map is going to be ok for some, great for others, and awful for a few. Your engine could be responding that much better to a panel filter than joe bloggs' up the road, the generic map won't be able to say your engine is doing that much better and needs that much fuel etc.