This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Has anyone on here noticed a difference in performance in these types of drives?? Im still using ide drives atm and thinking of upgrading one of them or maybe both as the one Windows is on is fat32 and a bit corrupted, wont go to ntfs for some reason. Is it worth the upgrade??
There is supposed to be a huge improvement on PATA drives but to be honest I've not noticed a huge difference. PATA drives are getting phases out though and motherboard are now supporting SATA as standard in general.
If you want a real difference you want to get a disk that is 10,000rpm, instead of the normal 7,200rpm or 5,400rpm.
I'll prob get a 80gig sata drive then as theyre cheap enough at the moment. Would the computer be funny if you had a sata for a master drive and ide ata for secondary??
Theres slight differences in performance but its not massive then again you wouldnt notice a massive difference even with a 10k rpm drive or 15k drive there are improvments but its not as much as people seem to think.
Benchmarks for sata seem to suggest theres a large difference in real world its not soo much.