LMAO, talk about spam, anyway, lemme find some proof for you!
Grrrrr, why is it half the sites at work are blocked! Anyway, heres summit
http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/performance/performance.aspx?model_id=238http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/performance/performance.aspx?model_id=238
Pre 96, 80bhp, post 96, 75bhp, doesnt actually say MPI/SPI on there but the MPI engine did have 5bhp less but more torque. (I can see another arugment starting now asking why the same car with less power is 1 second quicker to 60!) As I said though, strange Renault stuff might not have put the MPI engine into the S, i dunno why but you know Renault, lets put 2 different types of calipers on the same car, same year, same model just to annoy people, lets make a 1.8 Auto thats really slow, lets make a lighter version of the 172 then decide to add the weight back into it as a opition and destroy the exclusivity by whacking another colour in for a laugh. Lets make a limited edition Williams of 500, then decide to really piss off all the people that bought that by making the Williams 2 and 3. (Rant over)
Now if ya want arsey, you dickhead, listen to me now boy, there were mk1 MPI 1.4 Clios and I still dont believe the c**k and bull about a DOHC 1.2 16v.