scott said:
Nice Scott. How long was the exposure on the milky way ones? Quite a bit of movement in the stars I see.
I was reading a thread which tells you the best shutter speed for capturing static stars (I assume it all depends on how your camera copes with the high ISO though.. I think its 600 divided by the focal length but I'll try to find the page.
Love the trail one. You have a great area for dark skies looking north. Hopefully I'll manage one on Tuesday if the forecast is correct.
Cool. They look bloody good anyway. Nice RT by prof Brian Cox too.
Brilliant shots Scott! I'd be well happy with those. I struggle so much with light pollution around here
Near enough straight off the camera... Thanks (I guess) anyway !
^^ Dont like that at all sorry. Way too much saturation imo.
Gonna go shoot it on large format so I can sort the verticals out as its horrendous atm.
If it's reaaaaally a problem, keep the shots below 20s instead or lower your ISO.
Get a remote timer thing Single long exposures are very hard to get right.
Have one mate.
I mean for shooting stars like Scott did, you're going to ideally need the exact reverse of your suggestions, lol.
No no .. do 90/180/2000 shots @ 15s, care of the timer you spoon :rasp:
Something like this.. http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B007H50D0S/?tag=cliospnet01-21
Programmable timer I meant .. perhaps wasn't clear enough.